Illiar/feat/kyb validation poc (DRAFT) #2578
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe recent changes to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant ValidatorPOC
participant Validator
User->>App: Load Application
App->>ValidatorPOC: Render Validation Interface
ValidatorPOC->>Validator: Validate User Input
Validator->>ValidatorPOC: Return Validation Result
ValidatorPOC->>User: Display Validation Feedback
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/useValidate.ts (1)
72-95: Remove commented-out code.The commented-out code can be removed to improve readability and maintainability.
- // const valiateFn = ( - // elements: UIElementV2[], - // meta: { parent: UIElementV2 | null; deepthLevel: number } = { parent: null, deepthLevel: 0 }, - // ) => { - // for (const element of elements) { - // if (element.type === 'ui') continue; - // - // if (element.type === 'field') { - // errors = [...errors, ...fieldValidationStrategy(element, meta?.parent || undefined)]; - // } - // - // if (element.type === 'field-list') { - // errors = [...errors, ...arrayValidationStrategy(element, meta.deepthLevel)]; - // } - // - // if (element.children) { - // valiateFn(element.children, { - // ...meta, - // deepthLevel: meta.deepthLevel + 1, - // parent: element, - // }); - // } - // } - // };
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (26)
- apps/kyb-app/src/App.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/ValidatorPOC.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/Validator.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/ui-element.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/useValidate.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidatedInput/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidatedInput/useValidatedInput.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidator/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidator/useValidator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/types.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/validator.context.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validator-manager.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/min-length.value.validator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/value-validator.abstract.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc-definition.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/FieldList/FieldList.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/FieldList/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/SubmitButton/SubmitButton.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/SubmitButton/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/TextInput/TextInput.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/TextInput/index.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/router.tsx (2 hunks)
- services/workflows-service/prisma/data-migrations (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (8)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/index.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidatedInput/index.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidator/index.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidator/useValidator.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/index.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/FieldList/index.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/SubmitButton/index.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc/TextInput/index.ts
Additional context used
Biome
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/types.ts
[error] 11-11: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.ts
[error] 20-20: Invalid
typeofcomparison value: this expression is not a string literalnot a string literal
Unsafe fix: Compare the result oftypeofwith a valid type name(lint/suspicious/useValidTypeof)
[error] 20-20: Invalid
typeofcomparison value: this expression is not a string literalnot a string literal
Unsafe fix: Compare the result oftypeofwith a valid type name(lint/suspicious/useValidTypeof)
Additional comments not posted (61)
services/workflows-service/prisma/data-migrations (1)
1-1: Verify the impact of the updated subproject commit.The subproject commit reference has been updated. Ensure that the new commit
b5b8cded73bdeafe792b5e5cb51780ae8a2c58a7does not introduce breaking changes or regressions.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/value-validator.abstract.ts (1)
1-5: LGTM!The
ValueValidatorabstract class is well-defined, ensuring that subclasses implement thevalidatemethod.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidatedInput/useValidatedInput.ts (1)
1-8: LGTM!The
useValidatedInputhook is well-implemented, providing a clean way to retrieve validation errors for a given UI element.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/validator.context.ts (2)
1-5: LGTM!The imports and type definitions are correctly defined.
6-12: LGTM!The interface
IValidatorContextand context creation are correctly defined.apps/kyb-app/src/poc/SubmitButton/SubmitButton.tsx (3)
1-4: LGTM!The imports and component definition are correctly defined.
6-12: LGTM!The
handleSubmitfunction is correctly defined.
14-20: LGTM!The button rendering is correctly defined.
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/types.ts (2)
1-10: LGTM!The type definitions are correctly defined.
13-25: LGTM!The
UIElementV2interface is correctly defined.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.ts (2)
1-7: LGTM!The imports and interface definition look good.
9-14: LGTM!The
validatemethod correctly handles validation for required values.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validator-manager.ts (2)
1-8: LGTM!The imports and validators map look good.
10-13: LGTM!The type definition and constructor look good.
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/min-length.value.validator.ts (2)
1-6: LGTM!The imports and interface definition look good.
8-13: LGTM!The
validatemethod correctly handles validation for minimum length.apps/kyb-app/src/poc/FieldList/FieldList.tsx (3)
1-4: Imports look good.The imported modules and hooks are necessary for the functionality of the
FieldListcomponent.
6-11: Interface definition looks good.The
IFieldListPropsinterface is correctly defined and includes all necessary properties for theFieldListcomponent.
13-33: Component implementation looks good.The
FieldListcomponent is correctly implemented, usinguseMemoanduseValidatedInputhooks appropriately. The rendering logic is sound and handles errors correctly.apps/kyb-app/src/router.tsx (2)
6-7: Imports look good.The import statements are correctly adjusted to include the
ValidatorPOCcomponent.
44-47: Routing configuration looks good.The new route for the
ValidatorPOCcomponent is correctly added and the routing configuration is sound.apps/kyb-app/src/poc/TextInput/TextInput.tsx (3)
1-6: Imports look good.The imported modules, hooks, and components are necessary for the functionality of the
TextInputcomponent.
8-12: Interface definition looks good.The
ITextInputPropsinterface is correctly defined and includes all necessary properties for theTextInputcomponent.
14-31: Component implementation looks good.The
TextInputcomponent is correctly implemented, usinguseMemo,useValidatedInput, anduseCallbackhooks appropriately. The rendering logic is sound and handles errors correctly.apps/kyb-app/src/App.tsx (3)
5-5: LGTM!The import statement for
ValidatorPOCis correct.
19-31: Verify the architectural change.The original implementation, including several components, has been commented out. Ensure that this change is intentional and doesn't break the application.
32-32: LGTM! But verify the implementation ofValidatorPOC.The
Appcomponent now returnsValidatorPOC. Ensure thatValidatorPOCis correctly implemented and integrated.Verification successful
LGTM! The implementation of
ValidatorPOCis correct and properly integrated.
ValidatorPOCis defined inapps/kyb-app/src/ValidatorPOC.tsx.- It imports and uses several components and definitions.
- The form submission and nested input fields are handled correctly.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `ValidatorPOC`. # Test: Search for the implementation of `ValidatorPOC`. Expect: Correct implementation and integration. rg --type tsx 'ValidatorPOC'Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `ValidatorPOC`. # Add `tsx` as a recognized file type and search for `ValidatorPOC`. rg --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' 'ValidatorPOC'Length of output: 366
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the contents of `ValidatorPOC.tsx` to verify its implementation. cat apps/kyb-app/src/ValidatorPOC.tsxLength of output: 3866
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/Validator.tsx (2)
1-5: LGTM!The import statements are correct and necessary for the component's functionality.
9-13: LGTM!The
IValidatorPropsinterface is correctly defined and necessary for type safety.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/ui-element.ts (13)
1-10: LGTM!The import statements are correct and necessary for the class's functionality.
12-13: LGTM!The constructor is correctly implemented.
15-17: LGTM!The
getIdmethod is correctly implemented.
19-21: LGTM!The
getOriginIdmethod is correctly implemented.
23-25: LGTM!The
formatIdmethod is correctly implemented.
27-29: LGTM!The
getValueDestinationmethod is correctly implemented.
31-33: LGTM!The
formatValueDestinationmethod is correctly implemented.
35-41: LGTM!The
formatValueAndApplyStackIndexesmethod is correctly implemented.
43-47: LGTM!The
getValuemethod is correctly implemented.
49-55: LGTM!The
getValidatorsParamsmethod is correctly implemented.
58-67: LGTM!The
getValidatorParamsmethod is correctly implemented.
69-91: LGTM!The
getMinLengthParamsmethod is correctly implemented.
93-115: LGTM!The
getRequiredParamsmethod is correctly implemented.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/useValidate.ts (8)
1-4: Imports look good.The import statements are appropriate for the functionality provided in the file.
6-9: Interface definition looks good.The
IUseValidateParamsinterface is well-defined and appropriately typed.
11-17: Interface definition looks good.The
IValidationErrorinterface is well-defined and appropriately typed.
19-23: Hook definition looks good.The
useValidatehook is well-structured and usesuseCallbackappropriately.
24-46: Field validation strategy looks good.The
fieldValidationStrategyfunction is well-defined and handles validation errors appropriately.
48-70: Validation function looks good.The
validateFnfunction is well-structured and appropriately handles different element types and recursion.
97-99: Validation function invocation looks good.The invocation of
validateFnwith the provided elements and context is appropriate.
102-103: Return statement looks good.The return statement of the
useValidatehook is appropriate and ensures the validation function is accessible.apps/kyb-app/src/ValidatorPOC.tsx (5)
1-16: Imports and context definition look good.The import statements are appropriate for the functionality provided in the file. The context object is well-defined and structured.
18-26: Component definition looks good.The
ValidatorPOCcomponent is well-structured and follows React best practices. The form submission handler is appropriately defined.
27-99: Nested components look good.The nested
TextInputandFieldListcomponents are well-structured and appropriately utilize the context and element props. The usage ofstackensures proper handling of nested elements.
100-101: SubmitButton component looks good.The
SubmitButtoncomponent is appropriately placed within the form.
102-103: Return statement looks good.The return statement of the
ValidatorPOCcomponent is appropriate and ensures the form is wrapped in theValidatorcomponent.apps/kyb-app/src/poc-definition.ts (6)
1-2: Imports look good.The import statements are appropriate for the functionality provided in the file.
4-128: pocDefinition array looks good.The
pocDefinitionarray is well-defined and appropriately structured. The validation rules are clearly specified.
131-138: Context object looks good.The
contextobject is well-defined and structured.
140-146: Function definition looks good.The
formatDestinationfunction is well-defined and appropriately handles the formatting.
148-168: Iteration function looks good.The
iteratefunction is well-structured and appropriately handles different element types. The recursion ensures nested elements are processed.
170-170: Iteration function invocation looks good.The invocation of
iteratewith thepocDefinitionandcontextis appropriate.
| validate<TValidatorParams extends IBaseValueValidatorParams>( | ||
| value: unknown, | ||
| key: TValidator, | ||
| params: TValidatorParams, | ||
| ) { | ||
| const validator = new this.validators[key](params as any); | ||
| return validator.validate(value as any); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using any type.
The usage of any type should be avoided. Consider using a more specific type or a generic type.
- const validator = new this.validators[key](params as any);
- return validator.validate(value as any);
+ const validator = new this.validators[key](params);
+ return validator.validate(value);Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| static isMinLengthParams = (params: unknown): params is TMinLengthValidationParams => { | ||
| if (typeof params === 'boolean') return true; | ||
|
|
||
| //@ts-ignore | ||
| if ( | ||
| Array.isArray(params) && | ||
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | ||
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | ||
| ) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return false; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the typeof comparison and avoid @ts-ignore.
The typeof comparison on line 21 is invalid. It should compare against a string literal. The @ts-ignore comment should be avoided if possible.
- //@ts-ignore
- if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === number && typeof params?.[1] === string) {
+ if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && typeof params?.[1] === 'string') {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| static isMinLengthParams = (params: unknown): params is TMinLengthValidationParams => { | |
| if (typeof params === 'boolean') return true; | |
| //@ts-ignore | |
| if ( | |
| Array.isArray(params) && | |
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | |
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }; | |
| static isMinLengthParams = (params: unknown): params is TMinLengthValidationParams => { | |
| if (typeof params === 'boolean') return true; | |
| if ( | |
| Array.isArray(params) && | |
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | |
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }; |
| export const Validator: FunctionComponent<IValidatorProps> = ({ children, elements, context }) => { | ||
| const validate = useValidate({ elements, context }); | ||
| const [validationErrors, setValiationErrors] = useState<TValidationErrors>({}); | ||
|
|
||
| const onValidate = useCallback(() => { | ||
| const errors = validate(); | ||
| const validationErrors = errors.reduce((acc, error) => { | ||
| const element = new UIElement(error.element, context, error.stack); | ||
| acc[element.getId()] = error.message; | ||
|
|
||
| return acc; | ||
| }, {} as TValidationErrors); | ||
|
|
||
| setValiationErrors(validationErrors); | ||
|
|
||
| console.log({ errors, validationErrors }); | ||
|
|
||
| return Boolean(errors.length); | ||
| }, [validate]); | ||
|
|
||
| const ctx = useMemo( | ||
| () => ({ validate: onValidate, errors: validationErrors }), | ||
| [validationErrors, onValidate], | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| return <Provider value={ctx}>{children}</Provider>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the typo in the state setter function name.
The state setter function setValiationErrors should be setValidationErrors.
- const [validationErrors, setValiationErrors] = useState<TValidationErrors>({});
+ const [validationErrors, setValidationErrors] = useState<TValidationErrors>({});Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const Validator: FunctionComponent<IValidatorProps> = ({ children, elements, context }) => { | |
| const validate = useValidate({ elements, context }); | |
| const [validationErrors, setValiationErrors] = useState<TValidationErrors>({}); | |
| const onValidate = useCallback(() => { | |
| const errors = validate(); | |
| const validationErrors = errors.reduce((acc, error) => { | |
| const element = new UIElement(error.element, context, error.stack); | |
| acc[element.getId()] = error.message; | |
| return acc; | |
| }, {} as TValidationErrors); | |
| setValiationErrors(validationErrors); | |
| console.log({ errors, validationErrors }); | |
| return Boolean(errors.length); | |
| }, [validate]); | |
| const ctx = useMemo( | |
| () => ({ validate: onValidate, errors: validationErrors }), | |
| [validationErrors, onValidate], | |
| ); | |
| return <Provider value={ctx}>{children}</Provider>; | |
| export const Validator: FunctionComponent<IValidatorProps> = ({ children, elements, context }) => { | |
| const validate = useValidate({ elements, context }); | |
| const [validationErrors, setValidationErrors] = useState<TValidationErrors>({}); | |
| const onValidate = useCallback(() => { | |
| const errors = validate(); | |
| const validationErrors = errors.reduce((acc, error) => { | |
| const element = new UIElement(error.element, context, error.stack); | |
| acc[element.getId()] = error.message; | |
| return acc; | |
| }, {} as TValidationErrors); | |
| setValidationErrors(validationErrors); | |
| console.log({ errors, validationErrors }); | |
| return Boolean(errors.length); | |
| }, [validate]); | |
| const ctx = useMemo( | |
| () => ({ validate: onValidate, errors: validationErrors }), | |
| [validationErrors, onValidate], | |
| ); | |
| return <Provider value={ctx}>{children}</Provider>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/kyb-app/src/ValidatorPOC.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/useValidate.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/kyb-app/src/ValidatorPOC.tsx
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/useValidate.ts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (36)
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.unit.test.ts (8)
5-9: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is
undefined. Consider adding more edge cases likeNaNor an empty array for thoroughness.+ test('when value is NaN', () => { + const validator = new RequiredValueValidator({ message: 'error', required: true }); + expect(() => validator.validate(NaN)).toThrowError('error'); + });
11-15: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is an empty string. Consider adding more edge cases like an empty array for thoroughness.
+ test('when value is an empty array', () => { + const validator = new RequiredValueValidator({ message: 'error', required: true }); + expect(() => validator.validate([])).toThrowError('error'); + });
17-21: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is
null. Consider adding more edge cases like an empty object for thoroughness.+ test('when value is an empty object', () => { + const validator = new RequiredValueValidator({ message: 'error', required: true }); + expect(() => validator.validate({})).toThrowError('error'); + });
25-29: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation success scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is a non-empty string. Consider adding more edge cases like a non-empty array for thoroughness.
+ test('when value is a non-empty array', () => { + const validator = new RequiredValueValidator({ message: 'error', required: true }); + expect(() => validator.validate([1])).not.toThrow(); + });
31-35: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation success scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is not
null. Consider adding more edge cases like a non-empty object for thoroughness.+ test('when value is a non-empty object', () => { + const validator = new RequiredValueValidator({ message: 'error', required: true }); + expect(() => validator.validate({ key: 'value' })).not.toThrow(); + });
37-41: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation success scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is not
undefined. Consider adding more edge cases like a booleantruefor thoroughness.+ test('when value is true', () => { + const validator = new RequiredValueValidator({ message: 'error', required: true }); + expect(() => validator.validate(true)).not.toThrow(); + });
45-49: Ensure comprehensive testing of error message scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the default error message is used. Consider adding more edge cases like different data types for thoroughness.
+ test('should return default error message when value is 0', () => { + const validator = new RequiredValueValidator({ required: true }); + expect(() => validator.validate(0)).toThrowError('Value is required.'); + });
51-55: Ensure comprehensive testing of error message scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when a custom error message is provided. Consider adding more edge cases like different data types for thoroughness.
+ test('should return custom error message when value is 0', () => { + const validator = new RequiredValueValidator({ message: 'error', required: true }); + expect(() => validator.validate(0)).toThrowError('error'); + });apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/min-length.value.validator.unit.test.ts (9)
5-9: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is
undefined. Consider adding more edge cases likeNaNor an empty array for thoroughness.+ test('when value is NaN', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate(NaN)).toThrowError('error'); + });
11-15: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is below the minimum length. Consider adding more edge cases like an empty array for thoroughness.
+ test('when value is an empty array', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate([])).toThrowError('error'); + });
17-21: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is
null. Consider adding more edge cases like an empty object for thoroughness.+ test('when value is an empty object', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate({})).toThrowError('error'); + });
25-29: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation success scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is above the minimum length. Consider adding more edge cases like a non-empty array for thoroughness.
+ test('when value is a non-empty array', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6])).not.toThrow(); + });
31-35: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation success scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is equal to the minimum length. Consider adding more edge cases like a non-empty object for thoroughness.
+ test('when value is a non-empty object', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate({ key1: 'value1', key2: 'value2', key3: 'value3', key4: 'value4', key5: 'value5' })).not.toThrow(); + });
39-43: Ensure comprehensive testing of error message scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the default error message is used. Consider adding more edge cases like different data types for thoroughness.
+ test('should return default error message when value is 0', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5 }); + expect(() => validator.validate(0)).toThrowError('Minimum length is 5.'); + });
45-49: Ensure comprehensive testing of error message scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when a custom error message is provided. Consider adding more edge cases like different data types for thoroughness.
+ test('should return custom error message when value is 0', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate(0)).toThrowError('error'); + });
51-55: Ensure comprehensive testing of error message scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the
{minLength}tag is interpolated. Consider adding more edge cases like different data types for thoroughness.+ test('should interpolate {minLength} with the provided value when value is 0', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5, message: 'error {minLength}' }); + expect(() => validator.validate(0)).toThrowError('error 5'); + });
57-61: Ensure comprehensive testing of error message scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the error message does not contain the interpolation tag. Consider adding more edge cases like different data types for thoroughness.
+ test('error message should stay same if interpolation tag is not present when value is 0', () => { + const validator = new MinLengthValueValidator({ minLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate(0)).toThrowError('error'); + });apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/max-length.value.validator.unit.test.ts (6)
5-9: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is
undefined. Consider adding more edge cases likeNaNor an empty array for thoroughness.+ test('when value is NaN', () => { + const validator = new MaxLengthValueValidator({ maxLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate(NaN)).toThrowError('error'); + });
11-15: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is above the maximum length. Consider adding more edge cases like an empty array for thoroughness.
+ test('when value is an empty array', () => { + const validator = new MaxLengthValueValidator({ maxLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate([])).toThrowError('error'); + });
17-21: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation failure scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is
null. Consider adding more edge cases like an empty object for thoroughness.+ test('when value is an empty object', () => { + const validator = new MaxLengthValueValidator({ maxLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate({})).toThrowError('error'); + });
25-29: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation success scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is below the maximum length. Consider adding more edge cases like a non-empty array for thoroughness.
+ test('when value is a non-empty array', () => { + const validator = new MaxLengthValueValidator({ maxLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate([1, 2, 3, 4, 5])).not.toThrow(); + });
31-35: Ensure comprehensive testing of validation success scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the value is equal to the maximum length. Consider adding more edge cases like a non-empty object for thoroughness.
+ test('when value is a non-empty object', () => { + const validator = new MaxLengthValueValidator({ maxLength: 5, message: 'error' }); + expect(() => validator.validate({ key1: 'value1', key2: 'value2', key3: 'value3', key4: 'value4', key5: 'value5' })).not.toThrow(); + });
39-43: Ensure comprehensive testing of error message scenarios.The test correctly handles the case when the default error message is used. Consider adding more edge cases like different data types for thoroughness.
+ test('should return default error message when value is 0', () => { + const validator = new MaxLengthValueValidator({ maxLength: 5 }); + expect(() => validator.validate(0)).toThrowError('Maximum length is 5.'); + });apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/ui-element.ts (13)
16-17: Consider adding type annotations for constructor parameters.Adding type annotations for
element,context, andstackparameters can improve code readability and maintainability.- constructor(readonly element: UIElementV2, readonly context: unknown, readonly stack: number[]) {} + constructor(readonly element: UIElementV2, readonly context: any, readonly stack: number[]) {}
19-21: Consider adding return type annotations for public methods.Adding return type annotations for public methods can improve code readability and maintainability.
- getId() { + getId(): string {
23-25: Consider adding return type annotations for public methods.Adding return type annotations for public methods can improve code readability and maintainability.
- getOriginId() { + getOriginId(): string {
31-33: Consider adding return type annotations for public methods.Adding return type annotations for public methods can improve code readability and maintainability.
- getValueDestination() { + getValueDestination(): string {
47-51: Consider adding return type annotations for public methods.Adding return type annotations for public methods can improve code readability and maintainability.
- getValue() { + getValue(): any {
53-59: Consider adding return type annotations for public methods.Adding return type annotations for public methods can improve code readability and maintainability.
- getValidatorsParams() { + getValidatorsParams(): { validator: string, params: any }[] {
27-29: Consider adding return type annotations for private methods.Adding return type annotations for private methods can improve code readability and maintainability.
- private formatId(id: string) { + private formatId(id: string): string {
35-37: Consider adding return type annotations for private methods.Adding return type annotations for private methods can improve code readability and maintainability.
- private formatValueDestination(valueDestination: string) { + private formatValueDestination(valueDestination: string): string {
39-45: Consider adding return type annotations for private methods.Adding return type annotations for private methods can improve code readability and maintainability.
- private formatValueAndApplyStackIndexes(value: string) { + private formatValueAndApplyStackIndexes(value: string): string {
62-72: Improve error handling ingetValidatorParamsmethod.The method throws a generic error message. Consider providing more context in the error message to aid debugging.
- throw new Error('Invalid key'); + throw new Error(`Invalid validator key: ${key}`);
75-97: Improve error handling ingetMinLengthParamsmethod.The method throws a generic error message. Consider providing more context in the error message to aid debugging.
- throw new Error('Invalid params'); + throw new Error(`Invalid minLength params: ${_params}`);
99-121: Improve error handling ingetMaxLengthParamsmethod.The method throws a generic error message. Consider providing more context in the error message to aid debugging.
- throw new Error('Invalid params'); + throw new Error(`Invalid maxLength params: ${_params}`);
123-145: Improve error handling ingetRequiredParamsmethod.The method throws a generic error message. Consider providing more context in the error message to aid debugging.
- throw new Error('Invalid params'); + throw new Error(`Invalid required params: ${_params}`);
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/ui-element.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/types.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validator-manager.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/max-length.value.validator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/max-length.value.validator.unit.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/min-length.value.validator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/min-length.value.validator.unit.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.unit.test.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validator-manager.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/min-length.value.validator.ts
Additional context used
Biome
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/types.ts
[error] 16-16: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.ts
[error] 28-28: Invalid
typeofcomparison value: this expression is not a string literalnot a string literal
Unsafe fix: Compare the result oftypeofwith a valid type name(lint/suspicious/useValidTypeof)
[error] 28-28: Invalid
typeofcomparison value: this expression is not a string literalnot a string literal
Unsafe fix: Compare the result oftypeofwith a valid type name(lint/suspicious/useValidTypeof)
Additional comments not posted (17)
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/types.ts (8)
1-1: LGTM!The type alias
TValidatorErrorMessageis correctly defined.
3-3: LGTM!The type alias
TRequiredValidationParamsis correctly defined.
5-5: LGTM!The type alias
TMinLengthValidationParamsis correctly defined.
7-7: LGTM!The type alias
TMaxLengthValidationParamsis correctly defined.
9-12: LGTM!The type alias
TValidationParamsis correctly defined.
14-14: LGTM!The type alias
TValidatorsis correctly defined.
18-26: LGTM!The interface
UIElementV2is well-defined and covers all necessary properties for a UI element.
28-30: LGTM!The interface
IBaseValueValidatorParamsis well-defined and provides flexibility for value validators.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.ts (4)
1-5: LGTM!The imports are correct and necessary for the implementation.
7-9: LGTM!The interface
IRequiredValueValidatorParamsis well-defined and correctly extends the base interface.
12-16: LGTM!The
validatemethod is correctly implemented and performs the necessary validation.
18-22: LGTM!The
getErrorMessagemethod is correctly implemented and provides flexibility for error messages.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/max-length.value.validator.ts (4)
1-5: LGTM!The imports are correct and necessary for the implementation.
7-9: LGTM!The interface
IMaxLengthValueValidatorParamsis well-defined and correctly extends the base interface.
12-16: LGTM!The
validatemethod is correctly implemented and performs the necessary validation.
18-26: LGTM!The
getErrorMessagemethod is correctly implemented and provides flexibility for error messages.apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/ui-element.ts (1)
1-14: Ensure all imported modules are necessary.Verify that all the imported modules are used within the file. Unused imports can be removed to improve code clarity and reduce potential maintenance overhead.
|
|
||
| export type TValidators = 'required' | 'minLength' | 'maxLength'; | ||
|
|
||
| export interface IBaseFieldParams {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace the empty interface with a type alias.
An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
- export interface IBaseFieldParams {}
+ export type IBaseFieldParams = {};Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export interface IBaseFieldParams {} | |
| export type IBaseFieldParams = {}; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 16-16: An empty interface is equivalent to {}.
Safe fix: Use a type alias instead.
(lint/suspicious/noEmptyInterface)
| static isRequiredParams = (params: unknown): params is TRequiredValidationParams => { | ||
| if (typeof params === 'boolean') return true; | ||
|
|
||
| //@ts-ignore | ||
| if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === number && typeof params?.[1] === string) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return false; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the typeof comparison and avoid @ts-ignore.
The typeof comparison on line 28 is invalid. It should compare against a string literal. The @ts-ignore comment should be avoided if possible.
- //@ts-ignore
- if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === number && typeof params?.[1] === string) {
+ if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && typeof params?.[1] === 'string') {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| static isRequiredParams = (params: unknown): params is TRequiredValidationParams => { | |
| if (typeof params === 'boolean') return true; | |
| //@ts-ignore | |
| if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === number && typeof params?.[1] === string) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }; | |
| static isRequiredParams = (params: unknown): params is TRequiredValidationParams => { | |
| if (typeof params === 'boolean') return true; | |
| if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && typeof params?.[1] === 'string') { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }; |
Tools
Biome
[error] 28-28: Invalid
typeofcomparison value: this expression is not a string literalnot a string literal
Unsafe fix: Compare the result oftypeofwith a valid type name(lint/suspicious/useValidTypeof)
[error] 28-28: Invalid
typeofcomparison value: this expression is not a string literalnot a string literal
Unsafe fix: Compare the result oftypeofwith a valid type name(lint/suspicious/useValidTypeof)
| static isMaxLengthParams = (params: unknown): params is TMaxLengthValidationParams => { | ||
| if (typeof params === 'number') return true; | ||
|
|
||
| //@ts-ignore | ||
| if ( | ||
| Array.isArray(params) && | ||
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | ||
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | ||
| ) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return false; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix the typeof comparison and avoid @ts-ignore.
The typeof comparison on line 34 is invalid. It should compare against a string literal. The @ts-ignore comment should be avoided if possible.
- //@ts-ignore
- if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === number && typeof params?.[1] === string) {
+ if (Array.isArray(params) && typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && typeof params?.[1] === 'string') {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| static isMaxLengthParams = (params: unknown): params is TMaxLengthValidationParams => { | |
| if (typeof params === 'number') return true; | |
| //@ts-ignore | |
| if ( | |
| Array.isArray(params) && | |
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | |
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }; | |
| static isMaxLengthParams = (params: unknown): params is TMaxLengthValidationParams => { | |
| if (typeof params === 'number') return true; | |
| if ( | |
| Array.isArray(params) && | |
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | |
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/ui-element.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/types.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/pattern.value.validator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/pattern.value.validator.unit.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc-definition.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/types.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/required.value-validator.ts
- apps/kyb-app/src/poc-definition.ts
Additional comments not posted (24)
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/pattern.value.validator.ts (5)
7-9: Interface definition looks good.The
IPatternValidatorParamsinterface correctly extendsIBaseValueValidatorParamsand adds apatternproperty.
18-23: Method definition looks good.The
getErrorMessagemethod correctly returns a custom error message if provided, otherwise a default message.
1-5: Imports look good.The necessary types and base classes are correctly imported.
11-11: Class definition looks good.The
PatternValueValidatorclass is correctly defined and extendsValueValidator.
1-39: File structure looks good.The file structure is clear and maintains readability.
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/value-validators/pattern.value.validator.unit.test.ts (6)
5-9: Test case looks good.The test case correctly sets up a validator and expects an error when the value does not match the pattern.
11-15: Test case looks good.The test case correctly sets up a validator and expects an error when the value is null.
19-23: Test case looks good.The test case correctly sets up a validator and expects no error when the value matches the pattern.
27-31: Test case looks good.The test case correctly sets up a validator and expects the default error message when no custom message is provided.
33-37: Test case looks good.The test case correctly sets up a validator and expects the custom error message when provided.
39-51: Test case looks good.The test case correctly sets up a validator and expects the error message to interpolate the pattern.
apps/kyb-app/src/components/providers/Validator/hooks/useValidate/ui-element.ts (13)
21-21: Constructor looks good.The constructor correctly initializes the
UIElementwithelement,context, andstack.
23-25: Method definition looks good.The
getIdmethod correctly returns the formatted ID of the element.
27-29: Method definition looks good.The
getOriginIdmethod correctly returns the original ID of the element.
31-33: Method definition looks good.The
formatIdmethod correctly formats the ID by appending the stack values.
35-37: Method definition looks good.The
getValueDestinationmethod correctly returns the formatted value destination.
39-41: Method definition looks good.The
formatValueDestinationmethod correctly formats the value destination by applying stack indexes.
43-49: Method definition looks good.The
formatValueAndApplyStackIndexesmethod correctly formats the value by applying stack indexes.
51-55: Method definition looks good.The
getValuemethod correctly returns the value from the context using the value destination.
57-63: Method definition looks good.The
getValidatorsParamsmethod correctly returns an array of validator parameters.
66-78: Method definition looks good.The
getValidatorParamsmethod correctly returns the appropriate validator parameters based on the key.
81-103: Method definition looks good.The
getMinLengthParamsmethod correctly returns the minimum length validator parameters.
105-127: Method definition looks good.The
getMaxLengthParamsmethod correctly returns the maximum length validator parameters.
129-151: Method definition looks good.The
getRequiredParamsmethod correctly returns the required validator parameters.
| validate(value: unknown) { | ||
| if (!new RegExp(this.params.pattern).test(value as string)) { | ||
| throw new Error(this.getErrorMessage()); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle non-string values gracefully.
The validate method should handle non-string values more gracefully to avoid runtime errors.
- if (!new RegExp(this.params.pattern).test(value as string)) {
+ if (typeof value !== 'string' || !new RegExp(this.params.pattern).test(value)) {Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| validate(value: unknown) { | |
| if (!new RegExp(this.params.pattern).test(value as string)) { | |
| throw new Error(this.getErrorMessage()); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| validate(value: unknown) { | |
| if (typeof value !== 'string' || !new RegExp(this.params.pattern).test(value)) { | |
| throw new Error(this.getErrorMessage()); | |
| } | |
| } |
| static isPatternParams = (params: unknown): params is TPatternValidationParams => { | ||
| if (typeof params === 'boolean') return true; | ||
|
|
||
| //@ts-ignore | ||
| if ( | ||
| Array.isArray(params) && | ||
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | ||
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | ||
| ) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return false; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using @ts-ignore.
The isPatternParams method should avoid using @ts-ignore and handle the type check more explicitly.
- //@ts-ignore
if (
Array.isArray(params) &&
typeof params?.[0] === 'number' &&
typeof params?.[1] === 'string'
) {
return true;
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| static isPatternParams = (params: unknown): params is TPatternValidationParams => { | |
| if (typeof params === 'boolean') return true; | |
| //@ts-ignore | |
| if ( | |
| Array.isArray(params) && | |
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | |
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| return false; | |
| }; | |
| if ( | |
| Array.isArray(params) && | |
| typeof params?.[0] === 'number' && | |
| typeof params?.[1] === 'string' | |
| ) { | |
| return true; | |
| } |
| private getPatternParams() { | ||
| const _params = this.element.validation.pattern; | ||
|
|
||
| if (PatternValueValidator.isPatternParams(_params)) { | ||
| if (Array.isArray(_params)) { | ||
| return { | ||
| required: _params[0], | ||
| message: _params[1], | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const pattern = _params; | ||
|
|
||
| const params: IPatternValidatorParams = { | ||
| pattern, | ||
| message: `Value must match {pattern}.`, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| return params; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| throw new Error('Invalid params'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in returned object.
The getPatternParams method has a typo in the returned object where required should be pattern.
- required: _params[0],
+ pattern: _params[0],Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private getPatternParams() { | |
| const _params = this.element.validation.pattern; | |
| if (PatternValueValidator.isPatternParams(_params)) { | |
| if (Array.isArray(_params)) { | |
| return { | |
| required: _params[0], | |
| message: _params[1], | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| const pattern = _params; | |
| const params: IPatternValidatorParams = { | |
| pattern, | |
| message: `Value must match {pattern}.`, | |
| }; | |
| return params; | |
| } | |
| throw new Error('Invalid params'); | |
| } | |
| private getPatternParams() { | |
| const _params = this.element.validation.pattern; | |
| if (PatternValueValidator.isPatternParams(_params)) { | |
| if (Array.isArray(_params)) { | |
| return { | |
| pattern: _params[0], | |
| message: _params[1], | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| const pattern = _params; | |
| const params: IPatternValidatorParams = { | |
| pattern, | |
| message: `Value must match {pattern}.`, | |
| }; | |
| return params; | |
| } | |
| throw new Error('Invalid params'); | |
| } |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ValidatorPOCcomponent to streamline form validation.FieldList,TextInput, andSubmitButtoncomponents to enhance user input handling.Validatorcomponent and associated hooks.Routing
ValidatorPOCcomponent.Documentation
Bug Fixes