feat: New Parcel Map Layer with PID Labels

[popkinj]

• I tried combining the labels and outlines into one layer.. But I couldn't convince the WMS service to do it. Plus, I don't think it's in the WMS Spec to combine styles in on request.
• Combined the two new layers with the Crown land as they are from the same dataset.
  

---

Thanks for the PR!

Deployments, as required, will be available below:

• Frontend
• Backend

Please create PRs in draft mode. Mark as ready to enable:

• Analysis Workflow

After merge, new images are deployed in:

• Merge Workflow

[kdbelair]

• I would propose we rename "Parcel Fabric - Outlined" to "Parcels - Outlined" and "Parcel Fabric - Labeled" to "Parcel IDs"
• I believe these new layers makes the "Crown Provincial" redundant so we can remove
• I am not sure if iMapBC and ORI is using a different layer, but when I compared two areas in Departure Bay, Nanaimo against each other, it appears as if ORI does not include PIDs for all the parcels compared to iMap. See screenshots for an example
  
  . See screenshots for an example
  

[popkinj]

• I would propose we rename "Parcel Fabric - Outlined" to "Parcels - Outlined" and "Parcel Fabric - Labeled" to "Parcel IDs"

  • I believe these new layers makes the "Crown Provincial" redundant so we can remove

  • I am not sure if iMapBC and ORI is using a different layer, but when I compared two areas in Departure Bay, Nanaimo against each other, it appears as if ORI does not include PIDs for all the parcels compared to iMap. See screenshots for an example
    
    . See screenshots for an example
    

First and second points are done.
As for the iMap cross reference. They essentially use the same layer. What happens when you zoom in a bit on our map?

[kdbelair]

First and second points are done. As for the iMap cross reference. They essentially use the same layer. What happens when you zoom in a bit on our map?

This screenshot was taken at max zoom on ORI. Happy to share my screen. The changes to the layer names and and removal look good.

[kdbelair]

When you have finished with the layers, would you be able to provide me with the links to the BC Catalogue associated with each layer so we can document. Thank you.

[kdbelair]

Also noted that the "Indian Reserves" layer should be renamed to the following:

[popkinj]

When you have finished with the layers, would you be able to provide me with the links to the BC Catalogue associated with each layer so we can document. Thank you.

Both the outlines and labels come from the same layer in the BCGW https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/parcelmap-bc-parcel-fabric/resource/959af382-fb31-4f57-b8ea-e6dcb6ce2e0b

It's split up into individual styles. This is a bit of a barf... But you can see them all here https://openmaps.gov.bc.ca/geo/pub/WHSE_CADASTRE.PMBC_PARCEL_FABRIC_POLY_SVW/ows?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities

[popkinj]

Also noted that the "Indian Reserves" layer should be renamed to the following:

Done

[kdbelair]

@popkinj - Can you investigate the missing PIDs?

[kdbelair]

@popkinj - approved. @mishraomp - ready for your approval.

[mishraomp]

lgtm