Add new parameter LongVJut
as a VJut
-like counterpart to LongJut
.
#2606
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At some point when I was experimenting with phonetic ligatures, I noticed that the instances of
LongJut
, when applied to vertical juts, scaled the same as the horizontal applications, so this is an attempt to detach the two usages like howVJut
is toJut
.Currently, consequently (but still optionally),
LongVJut
does not scale with the font stretch property, which while unlikeLongJut
is closer to the behavior ofVJut
; If this is undesirable, then the additional line inparams/shape-weight.toml
can simply be commented out (Like howDescender
is implemented) and thus the functionality returns to how it was beforehand via the use of afallback
function toLongJut
inaesthetics.ptl
.Otherwise, at least under the default width configuration, it appears as visually unchanged.