Skip to content

Document production contract, performance and ownership handoff evidence - #29

Closed
acecchini wants to merge 3 commits into
codex/publication-gatefrom
codex/handoff-evidence
Closed

Document production contract, performance and ownership handoff evidence#29
acecchini wants to merge 3 commits into
codex/publication-gatefrom
codex/handoff-evidence

Conversation

@acecchini

@acecchini acecchini commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Receiving maintainers now have a production review page mapping the public contract to implementation modules, 17 feature/test families, audit findings A01–A10, independent PRs, observed support and exact release artifact evidence. It explicitly retains the native-union blocker, CuPy static policy decision and unconfigured administrative protections.

A reproducible benchmark compares normally installed baseline/candidate wheels with identical CPython 3.10.20, beartype rc0, NumPy and optree versions. Strict checks measured about 19.8 µs versus 21.8 µs in the baseline, with medians/spread and conversion/tree scaling recorded. No runtime optimization was introduced. Four added tests prove Value defaults/keywords and wrapped signatures in automatic/combined modes at both Python endpoints.

Validation: all hosted checks pass at 6845638; full hooks, rendered tables and 93 Python 3.10 snippets pass, with browser inspection of the report. The referenced release dry run completed 38 successful jobs, skipped publication, and its exact wheel passed 1,097 installed-consumer tests plus 95 GPU tests per endpoint.

Stacked on #28. This is review evidence, not authorization to merge, publish, change controls or transfer ownership.

Integration record: this reviewed head is preserved in main through PR #31, merge commit df81f00. The owner approved merging this work. This dependent PR is closed as integrated; its commits were not squashed or discarded.

@acecchini
acecchini marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2026 11:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant