feat: python config: use fix prefix on prod dependency updates #27
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We want that changes that will affect the application are deployed and released into dev/staging separately from code changes so that issues are discovered earlier and are easier to debug/diagnose.
cakemanny
requested review from
adrianeboyd,
cl3m0,
jackiewmacharia,
fraukesch,
ramonziai,
dev-olly and
karfau
karfau
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2025
adrianeboyd
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2025
ramonziai
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We want that changes that will affect the application are deployed and released into dev/staging separately from code changes so that issues are discovered earlier and are easier to debug/diagnose.
PS: based on our experience this is in any case how renovate will treat dependencies in projects that have switched to the pep621 scheme of putting them in
pyproject.tomlI plan to leave this open for feedback until at least Tuesday morning.
How has this been tested?
With/in https://github.com/bettermarks/cosying/pull/413