Skip to content

Conversation

ubdbra001
Copy link
Contributor

closes #30

My initial pass at this. I'm a bit unsure whether passing schema to the Dataset class as a parameter is the best approach, but I didn't want to hardcode the datatypes/modalities either. Thoughts @effigies ?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.06%. Comparing base (079719b) to head (8e37d7c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #31      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.94%   86.06%   +1.11%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         598      617      +19     
  Branches       95      102       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits          508      531      +23     
+ Misses         69       64       -5     
- Partials       21       22       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ubdbra001 ubdbra001 force-pushed the i30-develop-dataset-class branch from 86ac021 to 8e37d7c Compare September 1, 2025 11:13
@effigies
Copy link
Contributor

effigies commented Sep 1, 2025

+1 to including the schema into the dataset object.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Develop the Dataset class in context.py
2 participants