docs(readme): refine benchmark and architecture visuals - #32
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e7d108b9f7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| <path d="M380 545V548Q380 560 392 560H608Q620 560 620 566" class="arrow"/> | ||
| <path d="M1020 545V548Q1020 560 1008 560H792Q780 560 780 566" class="arrow"/> | ||
| <path d="M645 299V329Q645 341 631 341H394Q380 341 380 353V356" class="arrowPurple"/> | ||
| <path d="M805 299V329Q805 341 819 341H1006Q1020 341 1020 353V356" class="arrowPurple"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Route the context manager only to the HTTP service
In the README architecture diagram, this new branch runs from the BCG Context Manager directly into the Python SDK, even though the manager always constructs BcgClient and sends evicted turns to the HTTP /turns endpoint (agent-cli/src/core/context/bcg-context.ts:588, agent-cli/src/core/context/bcg-client.ts:39-49). The SDK is a separate direct-backend integration, as the SVG description itself states, so readers following this diagram may incorrectly expect the bundled Agent context manager to support an SDK/in-process path; remove this branch or originate it from a separate SDK consumer.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
Validation
ruff check .ruff format --check .git diff --check origin/main...HEAD