Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FIX] ScoringSheet deterministic results #7023

Merged

Conversation

ZanMervic
Copy link
Contributor

Issue

Fixes #6924

Includes
  • Code changes
  • Tests
  • Documentation

@markotoplak
Copy link
Member

Oh, that was where the randomness was coming from? Thanks!

Could you also make a test which tests for actual parameter value (hardcoded in the tests)?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.36%. Comparing base (7be875f) to head (92d1778).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7023      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.36%   88.36%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         332      332              
  Lines       73345    73345              
==========================================
- Hits        64813    64809       -4     
- Misses       8532     8536       +4     

@markotoplak markotoplak merged commit e67650f into biolab:master Feb 12, 2025
28 of 30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Scoring sheets model is not reproducible
2 participants