Skip to content

Add Developer Time Incentive for most groups #47

Open

Description

@jimmysong

One obvious incentive for most of these groups is minimizing development time to account for new features. When a new address type is added as a result of a consensus change, that naturally means development time to upgrade various systems.

Economic Nodes, Miners, Users and Investors have this incentive because they want to minimize the costs of running their nodes.

Application Developers have this incentive because they have to put in dev time to use new features at a minimum, and often have to upgrade non-trivial parts of the system (e.g. adding 2-of-2 Schnorr MuSig2 support for lightning channels)

As we saw with segwit, a lot of organizations are unwilling to pay this development cost, even with the economic incentive of lower fees, so it's obviously a big one to acknowledge.

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Incentive for most groups[/-] [+]Add Developer Time Incentive for most groups[/+] on Nov 14, 2024
  2. rencryptofish commented on Jan 3, 2025

    @rencryptofish
    Member

    that's a good point, do you want to propose the addition of that in a pull request?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions