-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DRAFT] WIP QML Load Snapshot Signet (160,000 height) #424
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
cb409e3
to
670ca05
Compare
With cb409e3 rebased and got rid off the extra options_mode settings which are not relevant for this evaluation. Also deleted the extra loadsnapshot.cpp file and instead added the load snapshot function in src/node/interfaces.cpp |
Should I be getting a binary specific for this issue? I tried loading a signet snapshot into the one for #421 but was unable to... |
670ca05
to
b77f7c1
Compare
With b77f7c1 minor tweaks to the src/node/interfaces.cpp snapshotload() function. It mimics the rpc call loadtxoutset from bitcoin/bitcoin repository Next will connect the loading to the progress bar |
b77f7c1
to
c59e557
Compare
with c59e557 Integrated the UI with the C++ backend, implementing a progress callback function to dynamically update the loading progress based on the number of coins processed. Touched src/validation.h and src/validation.cpp to extract the coin loading progress. Next: will update the "Loaded Snapshot" stack with the real info from the snapshot |
c59e557
to
e3f8c70
Compare
With e3f8c70 moved the load snapshot functionality from nodeModel to optionsModel since it make it easier to store the snapshot info and reduces redundant variable declarations. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With e3f8c70 moved the load snapshot functionality from nodeModel to optionsModel since it make it easier to store the snapshot info and reduces redundant variable declarations.
e3f8c70 is a regression because optionsmodel is not an appropriate place for this, and we are now violating the role of settings.json to store the state of a process.
NodeModel and AppMode are more appropriate places for this information. But the entire approach here is still a concept NACK as we are performing unecessary changes to validation and chainparams.
src/qml/models/options_model.cpp
Outdated
if (new_snapshot_load_completed != m_snapshot_load_completed) { | ||
m_snapshot_load_completed = new_snapshot_load_completed; | ||
if (m_onboarded) { | ||
m_node.updateRwSetting("snapshotloadcompleted", new_snapshot_load_completed); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be polluting settings.json that stores read/write configuration options for core -> with a state of a process. We cannot do this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, although I have a question for when we would want to allow the user to load a snapshot during onboarding, could the snapshot file path be stored in the settings.json?
Ok I tested artefact#235 and functionality & UI seems to work. Didn't see block clock so couldn't verify easily. Adding some UI feedback below:
|
e3f8c70
to
90dc0dd
Compare
with 90dc0dd rebased over main and addressed @jarolrod concerns by reverting back to just a minimal integration of the loading snapshot functionality. @yashrajd I will address the UI issues next As a follow up will investigate how to access the snapshot verification progress Also looking into how to make the snapshot data persist and be available for display (i.e. snapshot block height, date, and merkle hash) |
For the chainparams the changes there are only temporary for evaluating and testing within this repo. I checked upstream and the signet snapshot has already been hardcoded so once our repo is synced the changes in chainparams.cpp can be discarded. |
90dc0dd
to
85592f5
Compare
with 85592f5 made the snapshot activation persist on node restart by making use of the interface with chain->hasAssumedValidChain Also changed the green-check icon size to 30 pix Next looking into how to extract the progress from the ActivateSnapshot process |
85592f5
to
955c65d
Compare
with 955c65d modified the snapshotLoad() function in src/node/interfaces.cpp and the initializeSnapshot() function in nodemodel.cpp to extract progress information using regular expressions. This design decision aimed to keep snapshot loading mechanisms self-contained. However, it looks like the use of Perhaps the way to go is to use the handler in src/node/interfaces_ui ... will explore that path then update |
955c65d
to
0eba513
Compare
with 0eba513 reverted back to minimal snapshot load functionality. Snapshot loading progress is still not were I want it to be so in the meantime replaced the progress bar with placeholder text. Also updated the snapshot info display. once successfully loaded, and I'm using the hardcoded info in |
0eba513
to
cd2ec69
Compare
With cd2ec69 added a section to keep track of snapshot loading, it is not ideal so will look for better ways to achieve it. Since the core functionality is there will ask for "pre-reviews" before un-drafting |
5d0756c
to
262bb03
Compare
with 5d0756c updated with 262bb03 updated Next looking into how to finesse the snapshot loading progress... |
262bb03
to
a6bede5
Compare
with a6bede5 removed comments from |
a6bede5
to
799b4cd
Compare
with 799b4cd updated Also wanted to see if the Win64 CI completed successfully, which it did. Next will ask for feedback before un-drafting |
799b4cd
to
f23ffb8
Compare
f23ffb8
to
5d2ffb0
Compare
with 5d2ffb0 updated snapshotLoad() in src/node/interfaces.cpp. Left the polling loop for now as I investigate how to handle loading the snapshot if Pre-syncing and Syncing headers is still happening. Also removed JS functions and moved the logic to the nodemodel |
This introduce the UI flow to load a AssumeUTXO snapshot into the Bitcoin Core App. It modifies the connection seetings and adds a SnapshotSettings file, Icon, and modified profress bar. It has been rebased
Adds minimal wiring to connect QML GUI to loading a signet UTXO snapshot via the connection settings. Uses SnapshotSettings.qml to allow user interaction. Modifies src/interfaces/node.h, src/node/interfaces.cpp and chainparams.cpp (temporarily for signet snapshot testing) to expose snapshot loading functionality through the node model. Current limitations: - Not integrated with onboarding process - Requires manual navigation to connection settings after initial startup - Snapshot verification progress is not implemented yet Testing: 1. Start the node 2. Complete onboarding 3. Navigate to connection settings 4. Load snapshot from provided interface
5d2ffb0
to
8beb50a
Compare
8beb50a rebased over main |
Based on #421. For evaluation purposes only!
GUI Integration for UTXO Snapshot Loading
Overview
This PR adds initial GUI support for loading a
signet
UTXO snapshot at height 160,000, building on Bitcoin Core'sassumeutxo
infrastructure.What This PR Does
Implementation Details
Core Components Modified
src/node/interfaces.cpp
)snapshotLoad()
based on theloadtxoutset
RPCsrc/qml/models/nodemodel.cpp
)src/qml/components/SnapshotSettings.qml
)Key Design Decisions
assumeutxo
changesTesting Instructions
Ubuntu 22.04 Screenshots
Expected Behavior
Future Work
Handler
interface for snapshot eventsassumeutxo
changestestnet
andmainnet
)Notes for Reviewers
Snapshot Compatibility
signet
UTXO snapshotm_assumeutxo_data
(the changes there can be discarded once synced since
m_assumeutxo_data
is already hardcoded)This is a work in progress - feedback welcome on the approach and implementation details.