Skip to content

Conversation

@I501307
Copy link

@I501307 I501307 commented Nov 10, 2025

Description of the change

Adds ipFamilyPolicy and ipFamilies parameters to the HAProxy service configuration to enable dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 support in Kubernetes clusters.

Benefits

  • Enables deployment in dual-stack and IPv6-primary Kubernetes clusters
  • Aligns with dual-stack support already added to other Bitnami charts (elasticsearch, mariadb-galera)
  • Eliminates need for post-renderers or chart forking

Possible drawbacks

None. Changes are backward compatible with default empty values.

Applicable issues

Additional information

Changes follow the same pattern used in bitnami/elasticsearch (#24531).

Checklist

  • Chart version bumped in Chart.yaml according to semver
  • Variables are documented in the values.yaml and added to the README.md using readme-generator-for-helm
  • Title of the pull request follows this pattern [bitnami/haproxy] Add support for ipFamilyPolicy and ipFamilies
  • All commits signed off and in agreement of Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO)

@I501307 I501307 force-pushed the feat/haproxy-ipv6-support branch from df88da6 to 0c34730 Compare November 10, 2025 08:00
- Update Chart.yaml version from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1
- Update CHANGELOG.md version number to match Chart.yaml

This fixes CI validation that requires version bump when chart files are modified.

Signed-off-by: Awan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bitnami Bot <[email protected]>
@carrodher carrodher added verify Execute verification workflow for these changes in-progress labels Nov 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the triage Triage is needed label Nov 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request for review from carrodher November 10, 2025 09:12
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from migruiz4 November 10, 2025 09:12
@I501307
Copy link
Author

I501307 commented Nov 19, 2025

@migruiz4 please take a look at the changes required.

@I501307
Copy link
Author

I501307 commented Dec 1, 2025

@carrodher - FYI the related issue #36384 was auto-closed by the stale bot even though this PR is awaiting review.

Could you take a look at this PR? It's blocking production deployments and the changes are minimal, following existing patterns.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

haproxy in-progress verify Execute verification workflow for these changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[bitnami/haproxy] Add support for ipFamilyPolicy and ipFamilies service parameters

4 participants