-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
[PM-26455] Improve CI runtimes by disabling cpu intensive processes #1995
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1995 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 81.29% 75.72% -5.57%
==========================================
Files 822 1023 +201
Lines 52015 62181 +10166
==========================================
+ Hits 42285 47088 +4803
- Misses 9730 15093 +5363 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
b0b8388
5eb3fc1 to
ac65dc0
Compare
ac65dc0 to
6a65c54
Compare
6a65c54 to
1894dd0
Compare
cd06a9e to
dfe29e3
Compare
4e3d29b to
c1a9004
Compare
5a85449 to
c7f0c2c
Compare
18ea466 to
6fb70a6
Compare
6598299 to
6b1fa52
Compare
f2b68e3 to
9632043
Compare
9632043 to
af60637
Compare
| test: | ||
| name: Test | ||
| runs-on: macos-26 | ||
| timeout-minutes: 30 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 Do we still want to bump the timeouts, with everything else we're changing to make things lean?
| - name: Output processes | ||
| run: | | ||
| echo "Sorted by memory usage" | ||
| ps -em -o pid,pcpu,pmem,comm | head -n40 | ||
| echo "--------------------------------" | ||
| echo "Sorted by CPU usage" | ||
| ps -er -o pid,pcpu,pmem,comm | head -n40 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❓ Do we want this in the test-bwa as well?

🎟️ Tracking
N/A
📔 Objective
After the xcode 26 update our Test workflows have been hitting the 30min timeout limit. When runs are cancelled, we don't get a working
.xcresultwhich blocks our ability to troubleshoot. Increasing the timeout limit and using xlarge runners with the hope that we'll get useful.xcresultfiles that may help us find a root cause.⏰ Reminders before review
🦮 Reviewer guidelines
:+1:) or similar for great changes:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info:question:) for questions:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion:art:) for suggestions / improvements:x:) or:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes