docs: describe Logue as the workspace it is, not a writing assistant - #82
Merged
Conversation
The README led with "AI meeting notes & writing assistant", and the document half of the app was one bullet list under "AI Writing Editor" — with spaces, typed properties, relations, saved views and the graph buried at the bottom of it, below tone analysis. That reads as a meeting recorder with a text box attached. What is actually there is a workspace: nested spaces, a block editor with tables, callouts, code, Mermaid and LaTeX, typed properties, relations that compute their own inverses, wiki links with backlinks and a graph, saved views over eight filter fields and six comparators, an inbox, and 55 built-in templates. Meetings and tasks live in it; they are not the point of it. Split the section into Documents & Workspace and AI Writing Tools, and order the features so the workspace comes first and the surfaces that reach it come last. Header and Introduction rewritten to match.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The README led with "Privacy-first AI meeting notes & writing assistant for macOS", and the
document half of the app was a single bullet list under AI Writing Editor — with spaces,
typed properties, relations, saved views and the document graph sitting at the bottom of
it, below tone analysis and vocabulary suggestions.
That reads as a meeting recorder with a text box attached, and it is how the app has been
described everywhere: in the repository description, in this README, and in the copy written
from it. What is actually in the source is a workspace.
What is there
Checked against the code, not the previous README:
parentID, with icons and colourstext,number,date,boolean,listbelongsTo/has/relatedTo, inverses computedThe change
Split
✍️ AI Writing Editorinto📁 Documents & Workspaceand✍️ AI Writing Tools.The workspace features were bullets 9-13 of a section headed "Writing Editor"; they are the
larger half of the app and now have their own section, with the block types spelled out and
the saved-view filter model described concretely rather than as "save any filter".
Added nested spaces, the document graph and the 55 built-in templates — none of which
appeared anywhere in the README.
Reordered the ten feature sections. Documents & Workspace previously sat below Tasks and
below three sections about where you can talk to the agent. The order is now workspace,
writing, meetings, tasks, agent, then the surfaces that reach it.
Header and Introduction rewritten to match, and the
Logue/Views/line in Project Layout,which said "Meeting workspace, Writing editor".
One thing to weigh
The Introduction now says "If you have used Notion or Obsidian, you know the shape." It
orients a reader in one sentence, but it also frames the project against those products
rather than against the problem. Easy to cut if you would rather it stand alone.
Note on history
This commit was written on the
docs/fingerprint-readme-imagesbranch but pushed after #81had already merged, so it never reached
mainand #81 shows only its own commit. This is thesame failure mode as #73. Cherry-picked onto a fresh branch off current
main; no otherchange is carried along.