Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PHP 8.5] Use PHP_BUILD_DATE constant #65

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

Ayesh
Copy link
Contributor

@Ayesh Ayesh commented Nov 19, 2024

PHP 8.5 has a new constant named PHP_BUILD_DATE that contains the same value as the phpinfo build date.

We currently use "Build date" field parsed from phpinfo output, but on PHP 8.5, we can simply return the PHP_BUILD_DATE value.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced the buildDate method to return the PHP build date directly if available, improving efficiency.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Addressed potential issues with parsing the output of phpinfo() by introducing a new conditional check.

PHP 8.5 has a [new constant named `PHP_BUILD_DATE`](https://php.watch/versions/8.5/PHP_BUILD_DATE)
that contains the same value as the `phpinfo` build date.

We currently use "Build date" field parsed from `phpinfo` output, but
on PHP 8.5, we can simply return the `PHP_BUILD_DATE` value.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve a modification to the buildDate method in the Php class located in the src/Debug/Utility/Php.php file. A new conditional check has been added to return the constant PHP_BUILD_DATE if it is defined. This allows for a more direct retrieval of the PHP binary's build date, potentially eliminating the need for parsing phpinfo() output. No other methods or functionalities in the class were altered.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/Debug/Utility/Php.php Modified buildDate method to include a conditional check for PHP_BUILD_DATE.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A build date now finds its way.
With a check so neat and bright,
PHP's date shines in the light.
Hop along, let functions cheer,
For changes made, we hold so dear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/Debug/Utility/Php.php (2)

39-41: Documentation needs update to reflect PHP 8.5 support

The method documentation should be updated to reflect the new PHP 8.5 functionality:

 /**
  * Return the build date of the PHP binary
+ *
+ * As of PHP 8.5, uses the PHP_BUILD_DATE constant when available.
+ * For older versions, falls back to parsing phpinfo() output.
  *
  * @return string|null Returns null if build date cannot be determined
+ * @since 3.x.x Added PHP 8.5 PHP_BUILD_DATE constant support
  */

Line range hint 42-50: Consider adding comments and optimizing phpinfo capture

The fallback implementation is functional but could be improved for clarity and efficiency:

+        // Fallback for PHP < 8.5: Extract build date from phpinfo output
         \ob_start();
-        \phpinfo(INFO_GENERAL);
+        \phpinfo(\INFO_GENERAL);  // Only capture general info section
         $phpInfo = \ob_get_clean();
         $phpInfo = \strip_tags($phpInfo);
         \preg_match('/Build Date (?:=> )?([^\n]*)/', $phpInfo, $matches);
         return $matches
             ? $matches[1]
             : null;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a53c9f8 and 73d5ffc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Debug/Utility/Php.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Debug/Utility/Php.php (2)

39-41: LGTM! Clean implementation of PHP 8.5 constant support

The implementation correctly checks for and uses the new PHP_BUILD_DATE constant, following PHP best practices with proper constant scoping and early return pattern.


Line range hint 39-50: Verify test coverage and usage

Let's ensure this change is properly covered:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see that:

  1. The buildDate method is used in only 3 files:

    • src/Debug/Utility/Php.php (implementation)
    • src/Debug/Plugin/LogPhp.php (usage)
    • tests/Debug/Plugin/LogPhpTest.php (test)
  2. The test file exists and the changes appear to be covered by tests.

  3. The method is only used internally by the LogPhp plugin for debugging purposes.

Let me verify the test coverage and implementation:


Changes to buildDate method are safe and well-tested

The changes to the buildDate method are safe because:

  1. The method is only used internally by the LogPhp plugin for debug output
  2. The changes maintain backward compatibility by first checking for the constant
  3. The implementation is covered by tests that handle both cases (when build date is available and when it's null)
  4. The usage in LogPhp plugin properly handles the null case by conditionally logging the build date

The changes follow a proper fallback pattern and the test coverage confirms the behavior is working as expected.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing tests and usage of buildDate method
echo "Checking for test files..."
fd -e php -e phpt test

echo "Checking for buildDate method usage..."
rg -l "buildDate" --type php

echo "Checking for existing PHP version checks..."
rg "PHP_VERSION|defined\(" --type php

Length of output: 33341


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the test implementation
echo "=== Test Implementation ==="
rg -A 10 "buildDate" tests/Debug/Plugin/LogPhpTest.php

echo -e "\n=== Usage in LogPhp Plugin ==="
rg -A 5 "buildDate" src/Debug/Plugin/LogPhp.php

Length of output: 1060

@bkdotcom bkdotcom merged commit 278df1d into bkdotcom:master Nov 19, 2024
14 checks passed
@bkdotcom
Copy link
Owner

This is great!

(I opened php/php-src#16560)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants