Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add documentation for fields in v4.1 SV and CNV tables #1698

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ch-kr
Copy link
Contributor

@ch-kr ch-kr commented Mar 19, 2025

Updates v4 browser HTs help page to include documentation for browser SV and CNV HTs

@rileyhgrant
Copy link
Contributor

Just wanted to say thanks for writing this up, KC :)

Copy link
Contributor

@mike-w-wilson mike-w-wilson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple comments/questions

Comment on lines +277 to +278
- `type`: CNV type (deletion vs duplication).
- `alts`: CNV type (same as `type`).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So is this always a dup field?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep looks like it

- `copy_numbers`: Array containing information about multiallelic CNVs.
- `copy_number`: Copy numbers observed across samples.
- `ac`: Allele count of SV.
- `hemizygote_count`: Number of samples with heterozygous genotypes (biallelic sites only).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same comment as above...and now I'm doubting myself

@ch-kr ch-kr requested a review from mike-w-wilson March 24, 2025 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants