-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More detailed not_found error #260
Open
vansosnin
wants to merge
1
commit into
browserify:main
Choose a base branch
from
vansosnin:better_not_found_error
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a bit unclear what this is saying. What module should the user verify?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The one is not found
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ok - why is "installed" here? obviously you can't resolve anything that's not installed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can remove this obvious part:
Please verify that the module's package.json has 'main' field or it has index.js file
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess I’m wondering why all of this isn’t obvious. Modules must be installed to be resolved, and if it doesn’t have a “main” (explicit or implicit) then there’s nothing to resolve in the first place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As you can see on my example, it isn't obvious)
The case is: I have an installed module stretch-layout. It has neither index.js, nor
main
field in package.json. But it hasmodule
field in package.json (which is not even in spec yet) and it seems enough for bundler to resolve and build this module. And my point is that error "Cannot find module" is not precise enough, because there is module. But it's not prepared accurately. I think it's a bad pattern for that module, but it would be great if libraries likeresolve
, which are used by many other libraries, could detect error more precisely or even add support formodule
field, but it seems like more discussional change.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
module
field is both not standard, and also never ever will be - it's something a couple bundlers use that they never should have, and that no tooling should support by default.Indeed, that library is broken, and given that it doesn't even have a repo link, a "main", or "exports", i'd suggest avoiding it entirely.
While I agree a better error message here might be helpful, it'd be being shown to the consumer, who has no ability to fix the situation - only to perhaps file an issue. That's not going to help you in this case, because this package has no way to do so.