Skip to content

Handle OOM in component instantiate_pre more - #14759

Merged
alexcrichton merged 1 commit into
bytecodealliance:mainfrom
alexcrichton:handle-more-oom
Oct 15, 2026
Merged

alexcrichton merged 1 commit into
bytecodealliance:mainfrom
alexcrichton:handle-more-oom

Conversation

@alexcrichton

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Change another location to a Try* collection, and then also clarify the OOM-handling documentation to say that concurrency_support is explicitly not supported.

Change another location to a `Try*` collection, and then also clarify
the OOM-handling documentation to say that `concurrency_support` is
explicitly not supported.
@alexcrichton
alexcrichton requested review from a team as code owners October 14, 2026 23:29
@github-actions github-actions Bot added fuzzing Issues related to our fuzzing infrastructure wasmtime:api Related to the API of the `wasmtime` crate itself labels Oct 15, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @fitzgen

Details This issue or pull request has been labeled: "fuzzing", "wasmtime:api"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

  • fitzgen: fuzzing

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the .github/subscribe-to-label.json configuration file.

Learn more.

@alexcrichton
alexcrichton added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into bytecodealliance:main with commit 04226ad Oct 15, 2026
53 checks passed
@alexcrichton
alexcrichton deleted the handle-more-oom branch October 15, 2026 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fuzzing Issues related to our fuzzing infrastructure wasmtime:api Related to the API of the `wasmtime` crate itself

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants