Skip to content

[fix][cp] fix: Untangle some strange code in PlanBuilder::finalAggregation()#446

Open
WangGuangxin wants to merge 1 commit intobytedance:mainfrom
WangGuangxin:cp_12466
Open

[fix][cp] fix: Untangle some strange code in PlanBuilder::finalAggregation()#446
WangGuangxin wants to merge 1 commit intobytedance:mainfrom
WangGuangxin:cp_12466

Conversation

@WangGuangxin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@WangGuangxin WangGuangxin commented Mar 30, 2026

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #191

Type of Change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • 🚀 Performance improvement (optimization)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • 🔨 Refactoring (no logic changes)
  • 🔧 Build/CI or Infrastructure changes
  • 📝 Documentation only

Description

The code block is actually

if (!a) {
  VELOX_CHECK(a);
}

which is apparently wrong. The code was intentionally to find an aggregation with Step::kPartial. The patch recovers the right
readable logic.

Performance Impact

  • No Impact: This change does not affect the critical path (e.g., build system, doc, error handling).

  • Positive Impact: I have run benchmarks.

    Click to view Benchmark Results
    Paste your google-benchmark or TPC-H results here.
    Before: 10.5s
    After:   8.2s  (+20%)
    
  • Negative Impact: Explained below (e.g., trade-off for correctness).

Release Note

Checklist (For Author)

  • I have added/updated unit tests (ctest).
  • I have verified the code with local build (Release/Debug).
  • I have run clang-format / linters.
  • (Optional) I have run Sanitizers (ASAN/TSAN) locally for complex C++ changes.
  • No need to test or manual test.

Breaking Changes

  • No

  • Yes (Description: ...)

    Click to view Breaking Changes
    Breaking Changes:
    - Description of the breaking change.
    - Possible solutions or workarounds.
    - Any other relevant information.
    

…(#12466)

Summary:
The problematic code was brought in facebookincubator/velox#1419.

The code block is actually

```cpp
if (!a) {
  VELOX_CHECK(a);
}
```

which is apparently wrong. The code was intentionally to find an aggregation with `Step::kPartial`. The patch recovers the right
 readable logic.

Pull Request resolved: facebookincubator/velox#12466

Reviewed By: kagamiori

Differential Revision: D71768609

Pulled By: xiaoxmeng

fbshipit-source-id: 4da81c6f7ddba2fc550da30ee95c286d9618c81c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants