Skip to content

Conversation

@dhaarypravi
Copy link

@dhaarypravi dhaarypravi commented Jun 30, 2025

🔧 Overview

This PR introduces a retry mechanism for API requests made to the Groq endpoint (translateText and explainText functions in background.js). This addresses the problem where transient failures like network issues or 5xx server errors caused immediate failures and poor UX.


✅ What’s Changed

  • ✅ Added retry logic with up to 3 total attempts (1 original + 2 retries)
  • ✅ Retries are triggered on:
    • Network errors
    • 5xx server responses (like 502, 503, 504)
  • ✅ Logs each retry attempt for debugging purposes using console.warn()
  • ✅ Non-retriable errors (like 401, 403, 400) still throw immediately
  • ✅ Errors still bubble up to the popup, maintaining consistent error UI

💡 Why This Matters

Without retry logic, temporary network issues or Groq server downtime causes immediate user-facing failures. Now, the extension gracefully retries in the background, improving overall reliability and user trust.


🔗 Linked Issue

Fixes #12


🧪 Testing

  • Simulated API failure (503) — Retries succeeded on second attempt
  • Simulated API error (401) — Threw immediately, no retry
  • Confirmed error still shows popup if all retries fail

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added automatic retry logic for translation and explanation features to improve reliability during temporary server issues.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for translation and explanation requests, reducing failures caused by server errors.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The update introduces retry logic with exponential attempts to the translateText and explainText functions in background.js. Both functions now accept a retries parameter and attempt API requests multiple times on server errors, logging warnings on retries and failures. Function signatures are updated accordingly.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
background.js Added retry logic with exponential attempts to translateText and explainText. Updated their signatures to accept an optional retries parameter. Improved error handling and logging for API failures. Minor cleanup in context menu click listener.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement retry logic for API failures (network/5xx errors) (#12)
Update function signatures to support retries (#12)
Add logging for retry attempts and failures (#12)

Poem

In the code where errors once did play,
Now rabbits try, then try again, hooray!
With exponential hops and careful logs,
They leap past 5xx, outsmart the fogs.
No more failed fetches left to rue—
The code is strong, and so are you!
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b216f4 and 17298df.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • background.js (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
background.js (1)
content.js (2)
  • response (96-99)
  • response (146-149)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
background.js (5)

178-178: LGTM! Function signature updated correctly.

The addition of the retries parameter with a default value maintains backward compatibility while enabling configurable retry behavior.


192-200: Good optimization moving payload creation outside the retry loop.

This prevents unnecessary object recreation on each retry attempt, improving performance.


251-251: LGTM! Function signature updated correctly.

The addition of the retries parameter with a default value maintains backward compatibility while enabling configurable retry behavior.


278-286: Good optimization moving payload creation outside the retry loop.

This prevents unnecessary object recreation on each retry attempt, improving performance.


58-58: Verified translateText/explainText default-retries usage

All invocations of translateText and explainText only pass the required text argument and rely on the default retries = 2. No other calls require changes.

Comment on lines +289 to 333
for (let attempt = 0; attempt <= retries; attempt++) {
try {
const response = await fetch(
"https://api.groq.com/openai/v1/chat/completions",
{
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
Authorization: `Bearer ${groqApiKey}`,
},
body: JSON.stringify(payload),
}
);
}

const data = await response.json();
const explanation = data.choices[0].message.content.trim();
// If response not OK
if (!response.ok) {
const errorData = await response.json().catch(() => ({}));

if (!explanation) {
throw new Error("Empty explanation received");
}
// Retry only if server error (5xx)
if (response.status >= 500 && attempt < retries) {
console.warn(`Retrying explainText (attempt ${attempt + 1})`);
continue;
}

throw new Error(errorData.error?.message || `API error: ${response.status}`);
}

// Successful response
const data = await response.json();
const explanation = data.choices[0].message.content.trim();

return explanation;
} catch (error) {
console.error("Explanation error:", error);
throw error;
if (!explanation) {
throw new Error("Empty explanation received");
}

return explanation;

} catch (error) {
// Retry on failure, unless it's the last attempt
if (attempt === retries) {
throw error;
}
console.warn(`explainText failed on attempt ${attempt + 1}: ${error.message}`);
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Apply the same retry improvements as translateText.

The retry logic correctly handles 5xx server errors but has the same enhancement opportunities as the translateText function:

  1. Missing exponential backoff: Rapid successive retries may overwhelm the server
  2. Network errors not handled: Fetch exceptions don't trigger retries

Apply the same exponential backoff and network error handling improvements as suggested for the translateText function to maintain consistency between both functions.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In background.js from lines 289 to 333, the retry logic for the explainText
function lacks exponential backoff and does not handle network errors properly.
To fix this, implement an exponential backoff delay before each retry attempt to
avoid overwhelming the server, and ensure that fetch exceptions (network errors)
trigger retries as well. This will align the retry behavior with the
improvements made in the translateText function for consistency and robustness.

Comment on lines +202 to 245
for (let attempt = 0; attempt <= retries; attempt++) {
try {
const response = await fetch(
"https://api.groq.com/openai/v1/chat/completions",
{
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
Authorization: `Bearer ${groqApiKey}`,
},
body: JSON.stringify(payload),
}
);
}

const data = await response.json();
const translatedText = data.choices[0].message.content.trim();
if (!response.ok) {
const errorData = await response.json().catch(() => ({}));

if (!translatedText) {
throw new Error("Empty translation received");
}
// Retry only on server (5xx) errors
if (response.status >= 500 && attempt < retries) {
console.warn(`Retrying translateText (attempt ${attempt + 1})`);
continue;
}

return translatedText;
} catch (error) {
console.error("Translation error:", error);
throw error;
throw new Error(
errorData.error?.message || `API error: ${response.status}`
);
}

const data = await response.json();
const translatedText = data.choices[0].message.content.trim();

if (!translatedText) {
throw new Error("Empty translation received");
}

return translatedText;

} catch (error) {
if (attempt === retries) {
throw error;
}
console.warn(`translateText failed on attempt ${attempt + 1}: ${error.message}`);
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Implement exponential backoff and handle network errors.

The retry logic correctly handles 5xx server errors, but could be enhanced for better resilience:

  1. Missing exponential backoff: Rapid successive retries may overwhelm the server or hit rate limits
  2. Network errors not handled: Fetch exceptions (network timeouts, connection issues) don't trigger retries

Consider this enhanced implementation:

  for (let attempt = 0; attempt <= retries; attempt++) {
    try {
+     // Add exponential backoff delay (except for first attempt)
+     if (attempt > 0) {
+       const delay = Math.min(1000 * Math.pow(2, attempt - 1), 5000);
+       await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
+     }
+
      const response = await fetch(
        "https://api.groq.com/openai/v1/chat/completions",
        {
          method: "POST",
          headers: {
            "Content-Type": "application/json",
            Authorization: `Bearer ${groqApiKey}`,
          },
          body: JSON.stringify(payload),
        }
      );

      if (!response.ok) {
        const errorData = await response.json().catch(() => ({}));

        // Retry only on server (5xx) errors
        if (response.status >= 500 && attempt < retries) {
          console.warn(`Retrying translateText (attempt ${attempt + 1})`);
          continue;
        }

        throw new Error(
          errorData.error?.message || `API error: ${response.status}`
        );
      }

      const data = await response.json();
      const translatedText = data.choices[0].message.content.trim();

      if (!translatedText) {
        throw new Error("Empty translation received");
      }

      return translatedText;

    } catch (error) {
+     // Handle network errors (fetch exceptions) for retries
+     const isNetworkError = error.name === 'TypeError' || 
+                           error.message.includes('fetch') ||
+                           error.message.includes('network');
+     
+     if ((isNetworkError || error.message.includes('5')) && attempt < retries) {
+       console.warn(`translateText failed on attempt ${attempt + 1}: ${error.message}`);
+       continue;
+     }
+
      if (attempt === retries) {
        throw error;
      }
-     console.warn(`translateText failed on attempt ${attempt + 1}: ${error.message}`);
    }
  }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
for (let attempt = 0; attempt <= retries; attempt++) {
try {
const response = await fetch(
"https://api.groq.com/openai/v1/chat/completions",
{
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
Authorization: `Bearer ${groqApiKey}`,
},
body: JSON.stringify(payload),
}
);
}
const data = await response.json();
const translatedText = data.choices[0].message.content.trim();
if (!response.ok) {
const errorData = await response.json().catch(() => ({}));
if (!translatedText) {
throw new Error("Empty translation received");
}
// Retry only on server (5xx) errors
if (response.status >= 500 && attempt < retries) {
console.warn(`Retrying translateText (attempt ${attempt + 1})`);
continue;
}
return translatedText;
} catch (error) {
console.error("Translation error:", error);
throw error;
throw new Error(
errorData.error?.message || `API error: ${response.status}`
);
}
const data = await response.json();
const translatedText = data.choices[0].message.content.trim();
if (!translatedText) {
throw new Error("Empty translation received");
}
return translatedText;
} catch (error) {
if (attempt === retries) {
throw error;
}
console.warn(`translateText failed on attempt ${attempt + 1}: ${error.message}`);
}
}
for (let attempt = 0; attempt <= retries; attempt++) {
try {
// Add exponential backoff delay (except for first attempt)
if (attempt > 0) {
const delay = Math.min(1000 * Math.pow(2, attempt - 1), 5000);
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
}
const response = await fetch(
"https://api.groq.com/openai/v1/chat/completions",
{
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
Authorization: `Bearer ${groqApiKey}`,
},
body: JSON.stringify(payload),
}
);
if (!response.ok) {
const errorData = await response.json().catch(() => ({}));
// Retry only on server (5xx) errors
if (response.status >= 500 && attempt < retries) {
console.warn(`Retrying translateText (attempt ${attempt + 1})`);
continue;
}
throw new Error(
errorData.error?.message || `API error: ${response.status}`
);
}
const data = await response.json();
const translatedText = data.choices[0].message.content.trim();
if (!translatedText) {
throw new Error("Empty translation received");
}
return translatedText;
} catch (error) {
// Handle network errors (fetch exceptions) for retries
const isNetworkError =
error.name === 'TypeError' ||
error.message.includes('fetch') ||
error.message.includes('network');
if ((isNetworkError || error.message.includes('5')) && attempt < retries) {
console.warn(`translateText failed on attempt ${attempt + 1}: ${error.message}`);
continue;
}
if (attempt === retries) {
throw error;
}
}
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In background.js between lines 202 and 245, the retry logic for the fetch call
lacks exponential backoff and does not handle network errors properly. To fix
this, implement an exponential backoff delay before each retry attempt to space
out retries progressively. Also, ensure that any fetch exceptions (network
errors) are caught and trigger a retry, not just server 5xx responses. Add a
delay function and call it with an increasing timeout before continuing retries,
and wrap the fetch call in a try-catch that retries on both network errors and
server errors.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

No Retry Logic on API Failure

1 participant