Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Nov 27, 2024
|
@deusebio I think you mixed DPE-5958 and KF-5958 in the PR title, this is Kubeflow not Data Platform |
Contributor
Author
|
@Gu1nness ops, fixed it! thanks! |
Contributor
Author
|
Re-running tests using UATs from canonical/charmed-kubeflow-uats#137, both for |
7b23c09 to
8f94a51
Compare
Contributor
Author
misohu
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Testing the upgrade of the Kubeflow UAT to Python 3.10 or 3.12, see canonical/charmed-kubeflow-uats#137
The AKS and EKS runs have been positive using noble with python 3.12: