-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate property checked for logging schemas #1166
Conversation
abailly-iohk
commented
Nov 16, 2023
- CHANGELOG updated or not needed
- Documentation updated or not needed
- Haddocks updated or not needed
- No new TODOs introduced or explained herafter
117a450
to
a221a44
Compare
a221a44
to
3904636
Compare
Test Results368 tests +1 363 ✔️ +1 20m 0s ⏱️ -44s Results for commit d5f1370. ± Comparison against base commit d211207. This pull request removes 1 and adds 2 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Transactions CostsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
Cost of Init Transaction
Cost of Commit TransactionThis is using ada-only outputs for better comparability.
Cost of CollectCom Transaction
Cost of Close Transaction
Cost of Contest Transaction
Cost of Abort TransactionSome variation because of random mixture of still initial and already committed outputs.
Cost of FanOut TransactionInvolves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.
End-To-End Benchmark ResultsThis page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmarks results produced by Hydra's Continuous Integration system from the latest Please take those results with a grain of salt as they are currently produced from very limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Instead of focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, eg. how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes. Generated at 2023-11-19 17:29:37.912065308 UTC 3-nodes ScenarioA rather typical setup, with 3 nodes forming a Hydra head.
Baseline ScenarioThis scenario represents a minimal case and as such is a good baseline against which to assess the overhead introduced by more complex setups. There is a single hydra-node d with a single client submitting single input and single output transactions with a constant UTxO set of 1.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Maybe you want to do the same with all call sites of prop_validateJSONSchema
(IIRC there are multiple)
Yes, but AFAICT this is the only call site we |
3904636
to
d5f1370
Compare