Skip to content

Conversation

@karlb
Copy link

@karlb karlb commented Mar 24, 2025

We used ad644bc on the sequencer during the final dry run. We plan to run this in production, so we should make a proper release for it and to do that, we should move it to the release branch first. The changes are only required for the sequencer, other users can ignore the change.

We could limit this PR to bc42ea8 and ad644bc, but I prefer to use the exact same version as we tested in the dry run.

pputman-clabs and others added 5 commits March 16, 2025 17:24
* saving progress

* Fixes

---------

Co-authored-by: Paul Lange <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Paul Lange <[email protected]>
Prior to this change all migrations would use the L2 starting block time
as the rollup l2_time but, alfajores and baklava were migratied using
the l1 starting block time as the l2_time. So we need to select the time
to use appropriately in order to be able to correctly reproduce the
testnet migrations.
…#367)

* Set L1 safe and finalized head at startup of op-node

* Wrap initialization of L1 safe & finalized head in SyncStatus with if block

* Fix comment

* Fix commen

* Fix comment

* Fix codes based on feedback

* Fix comment

* Swap the order of fetching finalized and safe L1 block references

* Move L1 safe and finalized head fetching to the beginning of OpNode::Start

* Remove unnecessary empty line

* Add log in finalized
…hereum-optimism#14062) (#368)

This is a cherry picked PR from the upstream optimism repo,
original commit message below

-------------------------------------

* continue sequencing when L1TemporaryErrorEvent happens

* add TestSequencerL1TemporaryErrorEvent

* address comment

* fix test

Co-authored-by: zhiqiangxu <[email protected]>
@karlb
Copy link
Author

karlb commented Mar 24, 2025

I planned to do a merge-as-rebase here (which hopefully will just do a fast forward and keep the commit hashes), but only squashing is allowed. It doesn't really matter much either way. Should I just squash?

@karlb karlb merged commit 7fee006 into release/celo-v2.0.x Mar 24, 2025
33 checks passed
ezdac pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2025
* feat: add mul access lists test (#370)

* feat: add mul access lists test

* chore: polish

* chore: pre pr

* feat: add more tests

* feat: wip to add more tests

* fix: multiple msgs tests

* fix: semgrep (#371)

---------

Co-authored-by: Disco <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants