Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Spreadsheet phrasing (#5)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* Fix wording on spreadsheet.rst

* Update DM example to align with spreadsheet changes

* Update T&E example wording

* Update T&E example - purple team

* Update T&E Example -- adversary emulation
  • Loading branch information
blackwidow0616 authored Apr 8, 2024
1 parent 6eff97f commit 0d744c2
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/maxmature.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ To illustrate the impact of leveraging the best practices in the M3TID framework

* CTI: Subscribe to a customized threat intelligence feed.
* DM: Dedicate additional resources to developing and tuning detection analytics for identified adversary techniques.
* T&E: Institute a semi-annual purple team.
* T&E: Institute a semi-annual adversary emulation.

Those changes result in the following updated scores and the accompanying graphs:

Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/measuring.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ As a notional example of implementing this assessment and scoring approach, imag
Company A: In-house implementation of a nascent threat-informed defense.

* CTI: The organization has CTI on IOCs and software used across multiple ATT&CK Techniques. Analysts occasionally read freely available generic reports and disseminate IOCs to the rest of the team.
* DM: Despite excellent CTI, the company has not leveraged that CTI effectively to prioritize their investments in Defensive Measures. They automatically apply patches, collect data as per standard best-practices, run a set of imported SIGMA rules, respond to alerts as needed, and do not conduct any deception operations.
* T&E: The company is only minimally investing in Testing & Evaluation, limiting their current testing to an annual penetration test that is not tailored to any specific adversary or set of adversary behaviors.
* DM: Despite excellent CTI, the company has not leveraged that CTI effectively to prioritize their investments in Defensive Measures. They apply patches as needed, have identified critical assets, collect data as per standard best-practices, run a set of imported SIGMA rules, respond to alerts as needed, and do not conduct any deception operations.
* T&E: The company is only minimally investing in Testing & Evaluation, limiting their current testing to an annual purple team that is not tailored to any specific adversary or set of adversary behaviors. A report is generated.

To aid in leveraging this methodology for assessment, this paper is being released with a Proof of Concept spreadsheet-based calculator. The screenshots below are taken from
the Results tab of that calculator.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/spreadsheet.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Appendix B - Scoring Spreadsheet
================================

As part of the M3TID team implemented the Dimensions, Components, and Maturity Level framework, as well as the
As part of the M3TID project, the team implemented the Dimensions, Components, and Maturity Level framework, as well as the
measurement approach, in an Excel-based tool to make leveraging the M3TID framework more accessible for the
community. The tool has 6 main tabs, described below:

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 0d744c2

Please sign in to comment.