chore: add MIT LICENSE file#14
Merged
chatgptprojects merged 1 commit intochatgptprojects:mainfrom Apr 3, 2026
Merged
Conversation
The repo promote open-source tools but didn't have a license file itself. Without a license, the content is technically all-rights-reserved by default which is against the spirit of the project. Added MIT license which is the most permissive and common choice for documentation and guide repositories. This allow anyone to use, modify, and share the content freely.
Owner
|
Done. No need to create long AI generated comments. Feel free to just type succint messages. I am gonna read them if it is human written. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
The repo is a guide about open-source AI coding tools but it don't have a license file itself. Without a LICENSE file, the content is technically all-rights-reserved by copyright law. This mean technically nobody is allowed to copy, modify, or redistribute the guide without explicit permission.
This is ironic for a project that promote open source. Also GitHub show "No license" on the repo page which might make people hesitate to contribute or fork.
What I changed
Added MIT LICENSE file. MIT is the most common and permissive license for documentation repositories. It allow anyone to use, share, and modify the content freely with only requirement to include the copyright notice.
The README already have license badges for each tool listed (Apache 2.0, MIT, etc) - now the guide itself also have a clear license.