Add docstrings for ExcitationLine and RecombinationLine emission models.#435
Merged
jacklovell merged 2 commits intoMay 16, 2024
Merged
Conversation
jacklovell
requested changes
May 14, 2024
Member
jacklovell
left a comment
jacklovell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice. I suggest using raw strings to reduce the number of backslashes required, but otherwise looks good.
Member
Author
|
Thanks, @jacklovell, I converted docstrings to raw string format. |
jacklovell
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds missing docstrings for
ExcitationLineandRecombinationLineemission models. This was originally part of #386, but has been moved to a separate PR.