Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Try and outright solve substituted constraint #67

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2022
Merged

Try and outright solve substituted constraint #67

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2022

Conversation

rowanG077
Copy link
Member

@rowanG077 rowanG077 commented Aug 18, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Partially Fixes #65.

Now it can solve the 1 <= b constraint but it now requires a KnownNat b constraint. This is going wrong in the ghc-typelits-knownnat solver.

@rowanG077 rowanG077 removed the request for review from lmbollen November 11, 2022 09:37
@rowanG077
Copy link
Member Author

@christiaanb @martijnbastiaan I have rebased this PR.

@martijnbastiaan
Copy link
Member

@christiaanb ?

@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan merged commit 127c525 into master Nov 11, 2022
@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan deleted the fix-65 branch November 11, 2022 12:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan martijnbastiaan approved these changes

@christiaanb christiaanb christiaanb approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using intermediate type variables prevents deducing (1 <= 2^n)
3 participants
@rowanG077 @martijnbastiaan @christiaanb