Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ruby syntax bear #206

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2016
Merged

Ruby syntax bear #206

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2016

Conversation

mr-karan
Copy link
Contributor

RubyLintBear is now RubySyntaxBear because of
a new ruby-lint bear to be added and this name
makes more sense.

Fixes: coala-analyzer#190

@mention-bot
Copy link

By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @AbdealiJK and @SanketDG to be potential reviewers

@sils
Copy link
Member

sils commented Mar 10, 2016

@AbdealiLoKo
Copy link
Contributor

ack 6bbdf25

@AbdealiLoKo
Copy link
Contributor

@sils1297 gitmate is stuck. and its required.

@sils
Copy link
Member

sils commented Mar 11, 2016

ack 6bbdf25

@sils
Copy link
Member

sils commented Mar 11, 2016

hey please do a rebase, then we can merge this, I'm working on the gitmate issue and marked it as not required in the meantime

@sils
Copy link
Member

sils commented Mar 11, 2016

reack 9314231

RubyLintBear is now RubySyntaxBear because of
a new `ruby-lint` bear to be added and this name
makes more sense.

Fixes: #190
@sils
Copy link
Member

sils commented Mar 11, 2016

@sils
Copy link
Member

sils commented Mar 11, 2016

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link

rultor commented Mar 11, 2016

@rultor merge

@sils1297 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit d16759e into coala:master Mar 11, 2016
@rultor
Copy link

rultor commented Mar 11, 2016

@rultor merge

@sils1297 Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 1min)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants