Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PeptideShaker output in tabular format #507

Closed
trishorts opened this issue Mar 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

PeptideShaker output in tabular format #507

trishorts opened this issue Mar 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@trishorts
Copy link

We have a FlashLFQ user that wants to know how to export peptide shaker output in tabular format so they can import the results into our software. Do you have a manual or wiki entry that might help them out?

smith-chem-wisc/FlashLFQ#125

@hbarsnes
Copy link
Member

hbarsnes commented Mar 9, 2023

There is a section in our tutorial material on how to export data from PeptideShaker in different formats. Please check out pages 35 to 39 of Chapter 1.4 - Browsing Identification Results.

@trishorts
Copy link
Author

Thanks. I will pass the message onto our user and see if it resolves the issue.

@hbarsnes
Copy link
Member

hbarsnes commented Mar 9, 2023

Great! The exports are also available via the command line: https://github.com/compomics/peptide-shaker/wiki/PeptideShakerCLI#b---reportcli

@justmpm
Copy link

justmpm commented Mar 13, 2023

Hi,
I wasn't able to find a way to export a .tabular file from PeptideShaker, but I did find that both the Default PSM Report and the Extended PSM Report are compatible with FlashLFQ.

Cheers
Mike

@hbarsnes
Copy link
Member

Hi Mike,

Great that you were able to find a solution. All the text-based exports from PeptideShaker are indeed by default tab separated, and should therefore already be in the wanted format. Hence it is just a matter of including the columns you need.

Best regards,
Harald

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants