-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build Matplotlib 3.9.0rc1 #373
Conversation
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.03.04.06.16.51
…74b8f0 matplotlib v3.7.1
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.07.05.12.11.57
…fa7b62 matplotlib v3.7.2
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.09.11.19.37.56
3.7.3 he82bcd -Unpin Pyparsing
Matches changes in upstream with 3.8.0 final.
automerged PR by conda-forge/automerge-action
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.09.20.07.15.04
Reflect PSF-2.0 being an official SPDX license
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.10.10.09.57.53
automerged PR by conda-forge/automerge-action
automerged PR by conda-forge/automerge-action
…nda-forge-pinning 2023.11.17.15.21.27
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.06.28.09.32.10
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.06.28.09.32.10
TL;DR: The way we build against numpy has changed as of numpy 2.0. This bot PR has updated the recipe to account for the changes (see below for details). The biggest change is that we no longer need to use the oldest available numpy version at build time in order to support old numpy version at runtime - numpy will by default use a compatible ABI for the oldest still-supported numpy versions. Additionally, we no longer need to use `{{ pin_compatible("numpy") }}` as a run requirement - this has been handled for more than two years now by a run-export on the numpy package itself. The migrator will therefore remove any occurrences of this. However, by default, building against numpy 2.0 will assume that the package is compatible with numpy 2.0, which is not necessarily the case. You should check that the upstream package explicitly supports numpy 2.0, otherwise you need to add a `- numpy <2.0dev0` run requirement until that happens (check numpy issue 26191 for an overview of the most important packages). ### To-Dos: * [ ] Match run-requirements for numpy (i.e. check upstream `pyproject.toml` or however the project specifies numpy compatibility) * If upstream is not yet compatible with numpy 2.0, add `numpy <2.0dev0` upper bound under `run:`. * If upstream is already compatible with numpy 2.0, nothing else should be necessary in most cases. * If upstream requires a minimum numpy version newer than 1.19, you can add `numpy >=x.y` under `run:`. * [ ] Remove any remaining occurrences of `{{ pin_compatible("numpy") }}` that the bot may have missed. PS. If the build does not compile anymore, this is almost certainly a sign that the upstream project is not yet ready for numpy 2.0; do not close this PR until a version compatible with numpy 2.0 has been released upstream and on this feedstock (in the meantime, you can keep the bot from reopening this PR in case of git conflicts by marking it as a draft).
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.06.28.09.32.10
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.06.28.09.32.10
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.06.28.09.32.10
recipe/build_base.bat
Outdated
if "%CI%" == "azure" ( | ||
:: Hack to try removing problematic Python from Azure CI image | ||
:: Replace with conda-smithy solution when available | ||
:: xref: https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-smithy/pull/1966 | ||
set CLEANUP_DIRS=^ | ||
C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\Python;^ | ||
; | ||
|
||
%PYTHON% -m pip install --no-deps --no-build-isolation -vv . | ||
mkdir C:\empty | ||
for %%f in (%CLEANUP_DIRS:;= %) do ( | ||
if not [%%f] == [] ( | ||
echo Removing %%f | ||
dir %%f | ||
robocopy /purge /r:0 /w:0 /mt /ns /nc /np /nfl /ndl /njh /njs C:\empty %%f > nul 2>&1 | ||
rmdir /q %%f | ||
) | ||
) | ||
rmdir /q C:\empty | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Am planning to get this into conda-smithy ( conda-forge/conda-smithy#1966 )
However it is taking a bit longer to complete
So not to hold things up, have added similar logic here. With a note to follow up later
Ok all green 🥳 Please let me know if you need anything else here 🙂 |
Thanks Tom! 🙏 Looks like CI didn't start when this was merged. So have manually started it That said, it looks like this may run into the same failure you observed in comment: #390 (comment) |
The macOS and Windows builds passed Linux builds failed as expected Since this issue emerged, we have deployed a fix. So restarting failed builds to see if the remaining issues clear up |
All builds have now passed and uploaded packages |
Note that merging this PR into the |
Checklist
0
(if the version changed)conda-smithy
(Use the phrase@conda-forge-admin, please rerender
in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)