Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SecureComms: E2e Test SecureComms without KBS #2089

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

davidhadas
Copy link
Member

@davidhadas davidhadas commented Oct 6, 2024

Support testing SecureComms without KBS

See

Should be merged after #2065

@davidhadas davidhadas requested a review from a team as a code owner October 6, 2024 19:34
@davidhadas davidhadas changed the title SecureComms: Add support daemonConfig SecureComms: Test SecureComms without KBS Oct 6, 2024
@davidhadas davidhadas changed the title SecureComms: Test SecureComms without KBS SecureComms: E2e Test SecureComms without KBS Oct 7, 2024
@stevenhorsman stevenhorsman added the test_e2e_libvirt Run Libvirt e2e tests label Oct 7, 2024
@davidhadas davidhadas force-pushed the secComms_test_no_kbs branch 17 times, most recently from 9cb2420 to 9293ddb Compare October 8, 2024 21:40
Add support for e2e testing SecureComms without KBS

Signed-off-by: David Hadas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test_e2e_libvirt Run Libvirt e2e tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants