-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
rename "nopull" boolean to "pull" #1611
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideThis PR refactors the image-pulling flag from a negative Class diagram for updated accel_image function signature and usageclassDiagram
class accel_image {
+str accel_image(config: Config, pull: bool = True)
}
class Config
accel_image --> Config : uses
Flow diagram for logic inversion in accel_image pull flagflowchart TD
A[Start] --> B{pull is True?}
B -- Yes --> C[attempt_to_use_versioned returns True?]
C -- Yes --> D[Return image:vers]
C -- No --> E[Return image:latest]
B -- No --> D
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ktdreyer, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request implements a refactoring change to enhance code readability and maintainability by renaming a boolean parameter. The core change involves transforming a double-negative parameter into a positive one, making the logic more intuitive and straightforward to comprehend.
Highlights
- Parameter Renaming: Renamed the
nopullboolean parameter topullin theaccel_imagefunction for improved clarity and to eliminate a double-negative. This meanspull=Truenow explicitly indicates an image pull, andpull=Falseindicates no pull. - Logic Inversion and Call Site Updates: Updated all call sites of
accel_image(e.g., inramalama/cli.py) and internal conditional logic withinaccel_image(inramalama/common.py) to reflect the new parameter name and its inverted meaning. For instance,nopull=Truewas changed topull=False, andif nopullwas changed toif not pull.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request renames the nopull boolean to pull for improved clarity. The changes involve updating the default value and logic checks in the accel_image function, as well as adjusting the CLI argument. The feedback provided aims to improve code readability and maintainability by adding comments and explanations for the changes.
|
Thanks @ktdreyer |
Rename "nopull" to "pull" for improved clarity and readability. This avoids the double-negative, making the logic more straightforward to reason about. "pull = True" now means "pull the image", "pull = False" means "don't pull the image." Signed-off-by: Ken Dreyer <[email protected]>
|
I've added I hope we can remove the Signed-off-by ceremony and DCO bot requirement soon. We removed it in instructlab/dev-docs#192 recently. |
Rename
nopulltopullfor improved clarity and readability. This avoids the double-negative, making the logic more straightforward to reason about.pull = Truenow means "pull the image", andpull = Falsemeans "don't pull the image."Summary by Sourcery
Rename the
nopullflag topullin theaccel_imagefunction and update its default and logic checks, along with adjusting the CLI argument to use the new flag name.Enhancements:
nopullparameter topullinaccel_imageand invert its default value for clearer semanticspullinstead of double-negativenopullcheckspullflag and its inverted default