Add Project Claudia to README

[ansonsaju]

Add Project Claudia, an autonomous Adversarial AI Agent for localized red-teaming, including its architecture and integration details.

Summary by CodeRabbit

릴리스 노트

• 문서
  • README의 "Black-box attack" 섹션에 새로운 "Project Claudia" 항목을 추가했습니다. 프로젝트 요약, 포함 이유에 대한 설명, 그리고 GitHub 저장소로의 링크가 포함되어 있습니다.

[coderabbitai]

워크스루

README.md 파일에 "Black-box attack" 섹션 하위에 "Project Claudia" 항목이 추가되었습니다. 요약 설명, 포함 이유 설명, 그리고 GitHub 저장소 링크로 구성되며, 기존 내용은 변경되지 않았습니다.

변경사항

집단 / 파일	요약
문서 업데이트 README.md	Black-box attack 섹션 하위에 Project Claudia 설명(Summary, Why this belongs here?, Link) 10줄 추가.

예상 코드 리뷰 노력

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 분

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding Project Claudia content to the README file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

Warning

⚠️ This pull request might be slop. It has been flagged by CodeRabbit slop detection and should be reviewed carefully.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

41-48: 형식을 기존 Black-box 목록과 동일한 단일 불릿 엔트리로 맞춰주세요.

Line 41-48의 ### 소제목 구조는 이 섹션의 기존 패턴(논문/프로젝트 불릿 나열)과 달라 가독성과 일관성을 떨어뜨립니다. 현재 내용은 한 개의 불릿 항목으로 합치는 편이 좋습니다.

제안 diff

-### Summary
-Add Project Claudia - An autonomous Adversarial AI Agent for localized red-teaming.
-
-### Why this belongs here?
-Project Claudia utilizes a tri-agent duel architecture (Builder/Adversary/Judge) to automate vulnerability synthesis in codebases. It's built for air-gapped security audits and integrates with Project Luis for self-healing security cycles.
-
-### Link
-- [Project Claudia](https://github.com/ansonsaju/project-claudia) - Adversarial tri-agent engine for automated security verification.
+- [Project Claudia](https://github.com/ansonsaju/project-claudia): autonomous adversarial AI agent for localized red-teaming (`tri-agent`, `code-security`, `air-gapped`)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@README.md` around lines 41 - 48, README의 Project Claudia 항목이 현재 H3 헤드라인(###
Summary/Why this belongs here?/Link)로 분리되어 있어 기존 Black-box 목록의 단일 불릿 항목 형식과
불일치합니다; README의 해당 블록(문구에 "Project Claudia", "An autonomous Adversarial AI Agent
for localized red-teaming", 및 링크)을 찾아 세 개의 H3 섹션을 제거하고 기존 Black-box 항목과 동일한 단일
불릿 라인으로 합치되, 한 줄 내에 프로젝트 이름, 한두 문장 요약(예: "Adversarial tri-agent engine for
automated security verification") 및
링크(https://github.com/ansonsaju/project-claudia)를 포함하도록 포맷을 맞춰 주세요.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 42-45: The statement in the README that "integrates with Project
Luis for self-healing security cycles" is unverifiable as written; either add a
reference link to the supporting documentation or repository that demonstrates
this integration (e.g., link to Project Luis docs, integration guide, or a
README section) or soften the claim to a verifiable scope (e.g., "designed to
work with" or "can integrate with") so it no longer asserts an unproven
integration; update the sentence mentioning Project Claudia and the exact phrase
"integrates with Project Luis for self-healing security cycles" accordingly.

---

Nitpick comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 41-48: README의 Project Claudia 항목이 현재 H3 헤드라인(### Summary/Why this
belongs here?/Link)로 분리되어 있어 기존 Black-box 목록의 단일 불릿 항목 형식과 불일치합니다; README의 해당
블록(문구에 "Project Claudia", "An autonomous Adversarial AI Agent for localized
red-teaming", 및 링크)을 찾아 세 개의 H3 섹션을 제거하고 기존 Black-box 항목과 동일한 단일 불릿 라인으로 합치되, 한
줄 내에 프로젝트 이름, 한두 문장 요약(예: "Adversarial tri-agent engine for automated security
verification") 및 링크(https://github.com/ansonsaju/project-claudia)를 포함하도록 포맷을 맞춰
주세요.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0f382054-90ef-48d2-81b8-89b51693abb4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8ae124 and 9f5264b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

검증 불가능한 주장에는 근거 링크를 추가하거나 표현을 완화해주세요.

Line 45의 “integrates with Project Luis for self-healing security cycles”는 근거 링크가 없어 큐레이션 신뢰도를 낮출 수 있습니다. 관련 문서/README 링크를 붙이거나, 확인 가능한 범위로 문구를 축소하는 것을 권장합니다.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@README.md` around lines 42 - 45, The statement in the README that "integrates
with Project Luis for self-healing security cycles" is unverifiable as written;
either add a reference link to the supporting documentation or repository that
demonstrates this integration (e.g., link to Project Luis docs, integration
guide, or a README section) or soften the claim to a verifiable scope (e.g.,
"designed to work with" or "can integrate with") so it no longer asserts an
unproven integration; update the sentence mentioning Project Claudia and the
exact phrase "integrates with Project Luis for self-healing security cycles"
accordingly.