Merged
Conversation
tancheng
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2025
Contributor
This sounds a good idea, which is different from creating every |
tancheng
reviewed
Sep 27, 2025
update test and format
tancheng
reviewed
Oct 5, 2025
tancheng
reviewed
Oct 5, 2025
Contributor
|
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fuse
gep+load/store,mul+addinFusePatternPasswhich I observed them in most kernels and provide a C++ test case to verify the correctness.For now, the fusion should be written manually, I am working on searching on common patterns based on frequency and fusing different pattern into the same op but with different attributes to differentiate each other. I will finish this these days.