Skip to content

Conversation

@shitrerohit
Copy link
Contributor

@shitrerohit shitrerohit commented Sep 19, 2025

What?

Updated the package.json file with correct details

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated licensing information to Apache-2.0, clarifying usage and distribution terms.
  • Chores

    • Bumped application version to 2.1.2 to reflect the latest release.
    • Updated author metadata to "LFDT" to identify the current maintainer.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated package metadata in package.json: version set to 2.1.2, author set to "LFDT", and license changed to "Apache-2.0". No changes to scripts, dependencies, or other configuration.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Package metadata
package.json
Update version 2.0.0 → 2.1.2; set author to "LFDT"; change license MIT → Apache-2.0

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my nose at version two-point-one-two,
New author signs where blank once grew.
A license flipped beneath the moon,
JSON carrots stacked in tune.
(_/)
(•_•) Hop — metadata renewed.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "fix:updated the package.json file" is fully related to the changeset. The changes in the PR consist entirely of updates to the package.json file, specifically updating the version (2.0.0 to 2.1.2), author (empty string to "LFDT"), and license (MIT to Apache-2.0). The title directly and accurately reflects this main change, is concise and clear, and provides sufficient context for a teammate to understand that this PR involves updating package metadata in the package.json file.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/update-package-json-file

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a214b8 and a10e9a9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
package.json (2)

5-5: Prefer structured author/maintainers metadata.

Use an object and/or add a maintainers/contributors list for org ownership clarity.

Apply if desired:

-  "author": "LFDT",
+  "author": { "name": "LFDT" },
+  "maintainers": [
+    { "name": "LFDT Team", "email": "<[email protected]>" }
+  ],

1-7: Avoid accidental npm publish if this is not a public package.

If this repo isn’t meant to be published, mark it private.

 {
   "name": "api-gateway",
+  "private": true,
   "version": "2.1.0",
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7adb412 and 6a214b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump looks fine; ensure release hygiene (tag + changelog).

If this drives publishing/CI, add a CHANGELOG entry for 2.1.0 and create/rely on a v2.1.0 tag so downstream artifacts remain traceable.

"author": "",
"license": "MIT",
"author": "LFDT",
"license": "Apache-2.0",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

🧩 Analysis chain

License switch to Apache-2.0 requires repo-wide compliance updates.

Confirm legal sign‑off, update LICENSE to Apache‑2.0, add/refresh NOTICE, and scrub MIT mentions (README badges, headers). Check other packages in the repo aren’t still declaring MIT.

Run to verify:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "1) LICENSE presence and content"
test -f LICENSE && rg -n "Apache License, Version 2\.0" LICENSE || echo "LICENSE missing or not Apache-2.0"

echo -e "\n2) NOTICE presence (Apache recommends)"
test -f NOTICE || echo "NOTICE missing"

echo -e "\n3) Residual MIT references (excluding build artifacts)"
rg -nI -S '\bMIT\b' -g '!**/node_modules/**' -g '!**/dist/**' -g '!**/build/**' || true

echo -e "\n4) package.json files still declaring MIT"
fd -t f package.json | xargs -I{} rg -n '"license"\s*:\s*"MIT"' {} || true

Length of output: 405


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "1) LICENSE presence and content"
if [ -f LICENSE ]; then
  rg -n "Apache License, Version 2.0" LICENSE || grep -n "Apache License, Version 2.0" LICENSE || echo "LICENSE present but Apache-2.0 string not found"
else
  echo "LICENSE missing"
fi

echo -e "\n2) NOTICE presence (Apache recommends)"
test -f NOTICE || echo "NOTICE missing"

echo -e "\n3) Residual MIT references (fallback to grep, excluding common build dirs)"
grep -RIn --binary-files=without-match --exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=dist --exclude-dir=build --exclude-dir=.git -E '\bMIT\b' . || echo "no MIT matches found"

echo -e "\n4) package.json files still declaring MIT"
find . -type f -name package.json -not -path "./node_modules/*" -not -path "./dist/*" -not -path "./build/*" -print0 | \
  while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
    printf "\n== %s ==\n" "$file"
    grep -nE '"license"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*"MIT"' "$file" || true
  done

Length of output: 384


Add NOTICE and obtain legal sign‑off — LICENSE already Apache‑2.0

  • LICENSE verified to contain "Apache License, Version 2.0" (found in LICENSE).
  • NOTICE file missing — add a root NOTICE with required attributions.
  • No residual "MIT" occurrences found; checked package.json files: ./package.json, ./libs/aws/package.json, ./libs/common/package.json (none declare MIT).
  • Obtain and record legal sign‑off (corporate approval / CLA/DCO) before merging.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In package.json around line 6, the project already uses "Apache-2.0" but is
missing the required root NOTICE file and needs legal sign‑off; add a NOTICE
file at the repository root containing the required Apache 2.0 attribution
statements and any third‑party notices used by the project, ensure the
package.json license fields remain "Apache-2.0" (and update any other metadata
if necessary), and obtain and record corporate legal approval (CLA/DCO or
equivalent) before merging.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants