Add support for SkyDNS2. #71
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
uuid will become the path of the key, the rest of the fields in Service will be moved there, that are things like Name, Environment, etc. * skydns.go: evolve into a etcd client for updating the records * *.go: assorted changes Does not compile atm.
Again be backwards compatible so porting changes over to SkyDNS2 becomes easier.
* Port flags over * Get the infrastructure code in place
|
Is there any progress? |
|
[ Quoting [email protected] in "Re: [skydock] Add support for SkyDN..." ]
No. There is nobody working on this feature... Also see skynetservices/skydns#94 btw. /Miek Miek Gieben |
|
I see. Thanks. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ok, this is NON WORKING, but:
skydns.goto actually access an etcd instance are empty, but trivial to createremoveServicenow only takes anuuid, but it should prolly also take an event.Image so that the whole service.Key can be restored. This is the main issue to do be done and I'm not sure if this is the way forwardetcdup and running anyway