feat: optimize DSL rule phases and refactor zone types #3878
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
LaurenceJJones
commented
Sep 10, 2025
LaurenceJJones
commented
- Auto-optimize rules to phase 1 when possible (headers, method, URI, GET args)
- Maintain phase 2 for body-dependent zones (POST args, files, raw body)
- Enforce same-phase constraint for chained (AND) rules
- Allow independent phase optimization for OR rules
- Replace string maps with typed Zone struct for better maintainability
- Add comprehensive tests for mixed-phase scenarios
- Auto-optimize rules to phase 1 when possible (headers, method, URI, GET args) - Maintain phase 2 for body-dependent zones (POST args, files, raw body) - Enforce same-phase constraint for chained (AND) rules - Allow independent phase optimization for OR rules - Replace string maps with typed Zone struct for better maintainability - Add comprehensive tests for mixed-phase scenarios
|
@LaurenceJJones: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release automatically.
DetailsI am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository. |
|
@LaurenceJJones: There are no area labels on this PR. You can add as many areas as you see fit.
DetailsI am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository. |
|
/kind feature |
github-actions
bot
added
kind/feature
area/appsec
and removed
needs/kind
needs/area
labels
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3878 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 61.67% 61.67% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 406 406
Lines 41839 41889 +50
==========================================
+ Hits 25806 25833 +27
- Misses 13914 13930 +16
- Partials 2119 2126 +7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Manually run hub tests, results below 100% coverage, which makes sense since we changing phases should not impact effectiveness of rules. phase 2 rules: phase 1 rules: You can see most rules will optimize into |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.