compute/synchronization: Fix tls-on-demand questions #210
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Fix question rendering in drills/questions/tls-synchronization.md - Fix typo in drills/questions/tls-var-copies.md Signed-off-by: RagnarokMew <[email protected]>
teodutu
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2025
|
|
||
| - No, because the race condition remains. | ||
| It just doesn't manifest itself anymore | ||
| - No, because the race condition remains. It just doesn't manifest itself anymore |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We usually write one sentence per line, text is easier to review like this. But let's do this ugly fix until we fully fix the builder.
teodutu
added
the
needs-rendering
|
Published at https://cs-pub-ro.github.io/operating-systems/210/ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisite Checklist
Description of changes
Fixed the rendering of the first tls-on-demand question and a typo in the second question of tls-on-demand