Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude particular labels/annotations from propagation #53

Open
4 tasks
ymmt2005 opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #142
Open
4 tasks

Exclude particular labels/annotations from propagation #53

ymmt2005 opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #142
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ymmt2005
Copy link
Member

ymmt2005 commented May 12, 2022

What

Accurate can propagate any namespace resource between namespaces.
While copying the resource, all labels and annotations except for ones that contain kubernetes.io/ are inherited.

func cloneResource(res *unstructured.Unstructured, ns string) *unstructured.Unstructured {
c := res.DeepCopy()
delete(c.Object, "metadata")
delete(c.Object, "status")
c.SetNamespace(ns)
c.SetName(res.GetName())
labels := make(map[string]string)
for k, v := range res.GetLabels() {
if strings.Contains(k, "kubernetes.io/") {
continue
}
labels[k] = v
}
labels[constants.LabelCreatedBy] = constants.CreatedBy
c.SetLabels(labels)
annotations := make(map[string]string)
for k, v := range res.GetAnnotations() {
if strings.Contains(k, "kubernetes.io/") {
continue
}
annotations[k] = v
}
annotations[constants.AnnFrom] = res.GetNamespace()
c.SetAnnotations(annotations)
// special treatment for ServiceAccount
if c.GetAPIVersion() == "v1" && c.GetKind() == "ServiceAccount" {
delete(c.Object, "secrets")
}
return c
}

In some cases, the copied labels or annotations can cause problems.
For instance, if Argo CD is configured to track the managed resources by argocd.argoproj.io/instance label and the parent resource was created by Argo CD, the propagated resource would have the same label. Argo CD then tries to delete the propagated resource because the propagated resource is not found on the source Git repository.

So, add a feature to exclude particular labels or annotations from propagated resources.

How

Describe how to address the issue.

Checklist

  • Finish implementation of the issue
  • Test all functions
  • Have enough logs to trace activities
  • Notify developers of necessary actions
@ymmt2005 ymmt2005 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 12, 2022
@erikgb
Copy link
Contributor

erikgb commented Dec 10, 2023

@ymmt2005 Do you have any thoughts about the UX of this feature? Should it be configured:

  1. globally on the controller level, excluding labels/annotations for all propagated resources
  2. under watches in the controller configuration, excluding labels/annotations per resource type of propagated resources
  3. new label/annotation allowing this to be configured per resource instance of propagated resources

@erikgb
Copy link
Contributor

erikgb commented Jun 20, 2024

@zoetrope @ymmt2005 We are facing this issue in our clusters, and I want to fix it. Do you have some input to my question above? I think the implementation complexity will increase in order from 1 to 3. I only need this configured globally, so I'll vote for 1 - at least as a start.

@ymmt2005
Copy link
Member Author

@erikgb Sorry, I didn't notice your question.

I agree with option 1.

@erikgb erikgb linked a pull request Jun 30, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants