Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-17718 ddb: UI fix winteh interractive mode #15911

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

knard38
Copy link
Contributor

@knard38 knard38 commented Feb 14, 2025

Description

ddb can be start in interactive mode with providing the vos file to open as parameter.
However, other option such as -w or --debug can not be provided as illustrated in the following examples.

[root@wolf-66 tmp]# env PMEMOBJ_CONF="sds.at_create=0" ddb 5b4b931a-356c-4220-96db-12e37c665d54/vos-4
ddb version 2.7.101
ddb:  ls
Listing contents of '/'
CONT: (/[0]) /9e143bc1-61e3-4e58-b0c1-ec7fde63b79f
ddb:  ^D

[root@wolf-66 tmp]# env PMEMOBJ_CONF="sds.at_create=0" ddb -w 5b4b931a-356c-4220-96db-12e37c665d54/vos-4
ddb version 2.7.101
ERROR: -w: unknown command, try 'help'

[root@wolf-66 tmp]# env PMEMOBJ_CONF="sds.at_create=0" ddb --debug 5b4b931a-356c-4220-96db-12e37c665d54/vos-4
DEBUG 2025/02/14 13:11:58.549778 main.go:174: debug output enabled
DEBUG 2025/02/14 13:11:58.550186 main.go:186: Connect to path: 5b4b931a-356c-4220-96db-12e37c665d54/vos-4
ddb version 2.7.101
ERROR: --debug: unknown command, try 'help'

Before requesting gatekeeper:

  • Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
  • Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
  • Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
  • Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
  • Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

  • You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
  • The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
  • Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
  • Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
  • All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
  • Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
  • If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
  • Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
  • Extra checks if forced landing is requested
    • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
    • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
    • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
  • Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

Alolow ddb to be started in interractive mode with optional arguments
and the path of the vos file to open.

Signed-off-by: Cedric Koch-Hofer <[email protected]>
Copy link

Errors are Unable to load ticket data
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-17718

@knard38 knard38 self-assigned this Feb 14, 2025
@knard38 knard38 marked this pull request as ready for review February 18, 2025 16:13
@knard38 knard38 requested review from a team as code owners February 18, 2025 16:13
@knard38 knard38 requested review from janekmi and Nasf-Fan February 18, 2025 16:16
Copy link
Contributor

@kjacque kjacque left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have any ftests for ddb that could be run against this change with a commit pragma?

The change seems fine for interactive mode, but did you verify it doesn't break non-interactive mode?

@knard38
Copy link
Contributor Author

knard38 commented Feb 19, 2025

Do we have any ftests for ddb that could be run against this change with a commit pragma?

The change seems fine for interactive mode, but did you verify it doesn't break non-interactive mode?

From my understanding, the unit tests src/utils/ddb/tests should check this. There is also the following ftest which are testing ddb:

Thus I am going to merge with master and restart the CI with running the recovery tests.

@knard38
Copy link
Contributor Author

knard38 commented Feb 19, 2025

Do we have any ftests for ddb that could be run against this change with a commit pragma?
The change seems fine for interactive mode, but did you verify it doesn't break non-interactive mode?

From my understanding, the unit tests src/utils/ddb/tests should check this. There is also the following ftest which are testing ddb:

Thus I am going to merge with master and restart the CI with running the recovery tests.

Recovery functional tests will be run by the CI with the commit ed1400f

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Medium completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-15911/2/execution/node/1509/log

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants