Skip to content

Clarify six-pack QA merge instructions - #6

Closed
darlingm wants to merge 1 commit into
six-packfrom
fix/six-pack-merge-handoff-wording
Closed

Clarify six-pack QA merge instructions#6
darlingm wants to merge 1 commit into
six-packfrom
fix/six-pack-merge-handoff-wording

Conversation

@darlingm

@darlingm darlingm commented Jul 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Remove the command-shaped merge_and_process QA <commit> example from the six-pack QA-return rule.
  • State the required merge operation directly in natural language.
  • Preserve the existing QA verification, completion, and no-forward behavior.

Fix 2 of 2 for unclebob#2. The companion main change is #5 and updates the generated payload and shared protocol.

Test plan

  • git diff --check
  • Documentation-only change; six-pack does not carry the shared runtime test task

@darlingm
darlingm force-pushed the fix/six-pack-merge-handoff-wording branch from 74253f0 to a893b29 Compare July 17, 2026 23:12
Describe the QA return as a merge operation in natural language instead of repeating the command-shaped merge_and_process pseudo-code.

Fix 2 of 2 for unclebob#29.

Co-authored-by: GPT-5.6-sol (high) via Codex <noreply@openai.com>
@darlingm
darlingm force-pushed the fix/six-pack-merge-handoff-wording branch from a893b29 to 8f0fd1d Compare July 17, 2026 23:17
@darlingm darlingm closed this Jul 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant