Skip to content

ci: re-pin PR Hygiene for state labels and /skip-bots - #1040

Merged
shumkov merged 1 commit into
devfrom
chore/pr-hygiene-skip-bots-dev
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

shumkov merged 1 commit into
devfrom
chore/pr-hygiene-skip-bots-dev

Conversation

@shumkov

@shumkov shumkov commented Sep 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Re-pins the shared review workflow onto dashpay/stale_prs_are_bad#40.

A label per state. waiting-slot · waiting-bots · waiting-build · waiting-self-review · waiting-author · ready-for-human · ready-to-merge — exactly one at a time, the same words as the check and the report, so a pull request list says where each one stands. Drafts carry none.

bot-review-missed is bot-review-skipped. Skipped is what happened, whether the window ran out or a person decided.

/skip-bots. Anyone with write access — the author included — can post it to proceed without the bots that have not reported for the current head. The report says who did and the label goes on, so whoever reviews next sees it. A bot that objected, or left a thread open, has reported and is not skipped: dismiss the review or resolve the thread. Post /self-reviewed after the skip, as after any bot outcome. A new push clears it.

This caller now wakes on /skip-bots comments.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated pull request review workflow conditions to recognize the /skip-bots command in issue comments.
    • Updated the pinned workflow version used for automated review checks.

Every state carries a label now, one at a time, worded as the status is. The
waiver label reads bot-review-skipped. Anyone with write access can post
/skip-bots to proceed without the bots that have not reported for the current
head; the report names who did. This caller wakes on that comment.

dashpay/stale_prs_are_bad#40 landed as ae7c249182b8ea29eb488d604d7ade9ed9af9e2c.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: dashpay/rust-dashcore/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 392a0907-cec7-4150-96aa-1f6c4faf1136

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44fb0b1 and e831e8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pr-review-policy.yml
 _____________________________________
< CORS error? I'll cross that bridge. >
 -------------------------------------
  \
   \   (\__/)
       (•ㅅ•)
       /   づ
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@shumkov
shumkov merged commit 3df9f74 into dev Sep 20, 2026
30 of 32 checks passed
@shumkov
shumkov deleted the chore/pr-hygiene-skip-bots-dev branch September 20, 2026 16:17
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.14%. Comparing base (44fb0b1) to head (e831e8f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev    #1040   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.13%   77.14%           
=======================================
  Files         329      329           
  Lines       83862    83862           
=======================================
+ Hits        64689    64695    +6     
+ Misses      19173    19167    -6     
Flag Coverage Δ
core 78.24% <ø> (ø)
ffi 49.83% <ø> (ø)
rpc 20.00% <ø> (ø)
spv 92.17% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
wallet 79.96% <ø> (ø)
see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant