Skip to content

Conversation

@sundarshankar89
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes

What does this PR do?

Temperory Switch off of codecov till we do aggregated publishing of all test results in codecov

Relevant implementation details

Caveats/things to watch out for when reviewing:

Linked issues

Resolves #..

Functionality

  • added relevant user documentation
  • added new CLI command
  • modified existing command: databricks labs lakebridge ...
  • ... +add your own

Tests

  • manually tested
  • added unit tests
  • added integration tests

@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 self-assigned this Dec 5, 2025
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2025 03:05
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 added the internal technical pr's not end user facing label Dec 5, 2025
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 changed the title isolating failing tests Switching off codecov Dec 5, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.56%. Comparing base (f5b447f) to head (dcf8fa6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2180   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.56%   63.56%           
=======================================
  Files         100      100           
  Lines        8503     8503           
  Branches      885      885           
=======================================
  Hits         5405     5405           
  Misses       2931     2931           
  Partials      167      167           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2025

✅ 51/51 passed, 10 flaky, 3m37s total

Flaky tests:

  • 🤪 test_validate_non_empty_tables (25ms)
  • 🤪 test_validate_invalid_source_tech (185ms)
  • 🤪 test_validate_table_not_found (1ms)
  • 🤪 test_validate_successful_schema_check (339ms)
  • 🤪 test_validate_invalid_schema_check (1ms)
  • 🤪 test_transpiles_informatica_to_sparksql (22.784s)
  • 🤪 test_transpile_teradata_sql (23.859s)
  • 🤪 test_transpiles_informatica_to_sparksql_non_interactive[True] (4.142s)
  • 🤪 test_transpile_teradata_sql_non_interactive[False] (5.628s)
  • 🤪 test_transpile_teradata_sql_non_interactive[True] (5.572s)

Running from acceptance #3144

@gueniai gueniai requested a review from asnare December 9, 2025 15:39
Co-authored-by: Andrew Snare <[email protected]>
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 5a297d2 Dec 10, 2025
6 checks passed
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 deleted the chore/temp_switchoff_codecov branch December 10, 2025 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

internal technical pr's not end user facing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants