Conversation
|
Now we're on rvm can we switch easily to Ruby 2.0? That would make the pull request unnecessary, as the default encoding changes from ascii to UTF8, according to this: http://jekyllrb.com/docs/configuration/ |
|
Yes, it is easy now to use Ruby > 1.9, especially with the abstraction provided by the RVM alias (so would not require a code change). However it doesn't seem to fix the issue despite what the docs say. Your question has made me me dig deeper and it seems that it is down to the language environment variables. On the VMs the |
|
If you're running under apache, presumably |
|
@rossjones no, that doesn't seem to work (see here) by this does 1130052 |
This is working now, but due to encoding issues the Jekyll site won't compile until my pull request has been merged:
UKGovLD/ukgovldwg#70