Skip to content

Analyzing the performance among various algorithmic, hedge, and mutual fund portfolios and comparing them to the S&P 500.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

davidtstill/Portfolio_Analysis

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

7 Commits
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Portfolio_Analysis

This analysis has two parts.

This first part of the analysis evaluates the performance among various algorithmic, hedge, and mutual fund portfolios and compares them against the S&P 500.

The second part of the analysis involved creating a custom portfolio called "My Portfolio". This custom portfolio comprised the historical closing prices for Qualcomm, Coke and Disney. Lastly I compared the performance of "My Portfolio" against the initial group of funds to see how it stacked up.

Key findings include:

  • Algo 1, an algorithmic trading hedgefund, had the highest cumulative return and the S&P 500 had the lowest.
  • Berkshire Bathaway and Tiger Global Management both had higher annualized standard deviations than the S&P 500. BRKB and Tiger Global Management's fund and are therefore riskier investments as measured by volatility.
  • Algo 1 had the highest Sharpe Ratio by far at 1.36. Berkshire Hathaway and Algo 2 also had high Sharpe ratios at 0.52 and 0.51 respectively.
  • My Portfolio had the 3rd highest standard deviation and the 4th highest Sharpe ratio, indicating that strong returns helped to offset the higher volaility.

About

Analyzing the performance among various algorithmic, hedge, and mutual fund portfolios and comparing them to the S&P 500.

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published