Skip to content

New feature#34

Open
dejarno wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
new-feature
Open

New feature#34
dejarno wants to merge 11 commits into
mainfrom
new-feature

Conversation

@dejarno

@dejarno dejarno commented May 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary by Aikido

⚠️ Security Issues: 1 Quality Issues: 0 Resolved Issues: 0

⚡ Enhancements

  • Enabled Vitest benchmarks and added test/bench scripts and deps
  • Added CodSpeed GitHub Actions workflow to run benchmarks CI

📚 Documentation

  • Added WARP.md with setup, run, test, and architecture guidance

More info

dejarno and others added 11 commits November 14, 2025 15:16
Co-authored-by: dejarno <2677077+dejarno@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: dejarno <2677077+dejarno@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: dejarno <2677077+dejarno@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: dejarno <2677077+dejarno@users.noreply.github.com>
Removed the intentional for-loop slowdown that was concatenating 10,000 numbers.
Performance improved from ~8,000 ops/sec to ~494,000 ops/sec (60x faster).

Co-authored-by: dejarno <2677077+dejarno@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@dejarno has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 57 minutes and 4 seconds before requesting another review.

You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c305055e-cd36-4e44-bf8e-a95892224e2d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61e9d5e and 2d51d58.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • .aikido
  • .github/workflows/codspeed.yml
  • WARP.md
  • package.json
  • src/config.ts
  • src/form.ts
  • src/server.ts
  • src/signature.ts
  • src/types.ts
  • test/bench/signature.bench.ts
  • vitest.config.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch new-feature

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

- name: Install dependencies
run: npm install
- name: Run the benchmarks
uses: CodSpeedHQ/action@v4

@aikido-pr-checks aikido-pr-checks Bot May 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

3rd party Github Actions should be pinned - high severity
A third-party GitHub Action was imported, and is not pinned via a hash. This leaves your CI/CD at risk for potential supply chain attacks, if the affected GitHub Action is compromised.

Suggested change
uses: CodSpeedHQ/action@v4
uses: CodSpeedHQ/action@3194d9a39c4d46684cb44bf7207fc56626aad8fd # v4

Reply @AikidoSec ignore: [REASON] to ignore this issue.
More info

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aikido ignore: testing out ignoring from pr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Based on your feedback, we ignored this issue because of the following reason:

testing out ignoring from pr

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aikido ignore

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
B Security Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@lindalacic

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@aikido ignore

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants