Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

95912 Check most recent status prior to sending ZSF email - IVC CHAMPVA forms #20044

Draft
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

michaelclement
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelclement michaelclement commented Dec 27, 2024

Summary

  • This work is behind a feature toggle (flipper): YES/NO
  • (Summarize the changes that have been made to the platform)
  • (If bug, how to reproduce)
  • (What is the solution, why is this the solution?)
  • (Which team do you work for, does your team own the maintenance of this component?)
  • (If introducing a flipper, what is the success criteria being targeted?)

Related issue(s)

Testing done

  • New code is covered by unit tests
  • Describe what the old behavior was prior to the change
  • Describe the steps required to verify your changes are working as expected. Exclusively stating 'Specs run' is NOT acceptable as appropriate testing
  • If this work is behind a flipper:
    • Tests need to be written for both the flipper on and flipper off scenarios. Docs.
    • What is the testing plan for rolling out the feature?

Screenshots

Note: Optional

What areas of the site does it impact?

(Describe what parts of the site are impacted andifcode touched other areas)

Acceptance criteria

  • I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
  • No error nor warning in the console.
  • Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
  • Documentation has been updated (link to documentation)
  • No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
  • Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog (if applicable)
  • If app impacted requires authentication, did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected
  • I added a screenshot of the developed feature

Requested Feedback

(OPTIONAL)What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?

@va-vfs-bot va-vfs-bot temporarily deployed to 95912-check-most-recent-status-prior-to-sending-zsf-email/main/main December 27, 2024 20:21 Inactive
Comment on lines 57 to 82
##
# Checks if a provided IvcChampvaForm record has a corresponding PEGA report
#
# @param record [IvcChampvaForm] the form record to check against the PEGA reporting API
# @return [Hash|boolean] Either a single PEGA report or `false` (if no report was found)
def record_has_matching_report(record)
# A report looks like:
# {
# "Creation Date"=>"2024-12-17T07:42:28.307000",
# "PEGA Case ID"=>"D-XXXXX",
# "Status"=>"Processed"
# }

# Querying by date requires a window of at least 1 day:
date_start = record.created_at.strftime('%m/%d/%Y')
date_end = (record.created_at + 1.day).strftime('%m/%d/%Y')
# There should only be one match per case ID, so query reports and grab 0th item:
# TODO:
# In practice this won't actually work, because any report with a `nil`
# `pega_status` on our side won't actually have a `case_id` to filter by...
# what we REALLY need is to add the `form_uuid` property into the PEGA reports
report = get_report(date_start, date_end).select { |rep| rep['PEGA Case ID'] == record.case_id }[0]
# If a report exists, return the IVC record and the corresponding report
# otherwise, return false
record && report ? report : false
end
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the actual contribution of this PR so far.

@va-vfs-bot va-vfs-bot temporarily deployed to 95912-check-most-recent-status-prior-to-sending-zsf-email/main/main December 31, 2024 18:49 Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants