Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dependents | 101123: QA fixes (2nd round) #34157

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Midge-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@Midge-dev Midge-dev commented Jan 17, 2025

Note: Delete the description statements, complete each step. None are optional, but can be justified as to why they cannot be completed as written. Provide known gaps to testing that may raise the risk of merging to production.

Are you removing, renaming or moving a folder in this PR?

  • No, I'm not changing any folders (skip to TeamSites and delete the rest of this section)
  • Yes, I'm removing, renaming or moving a folder

If the folder you changed contains a manifest.json, search for its entryName in the content-build registry.json (the entryName there will match).

If an entry for this folder exists in content-build and you are:

  1. Deleting a folder:

    1. First search vets-website for all instances of the entryName in your manifest.json and remove them in a separate PR. Look particularly for references in src/applications/static-pages/static-pages-entry.js and src/platform/forms/constants.js. If you do not do this, other applications will break!
      • Add the link to your merged vets-website PR here
    2. Then, Delete the application entry in registry.json and merge that PR before this one
      • Add the link to your merged content-build PR here
  2. Renaming or moving a folder: Update the entry in the registry.json, but do not merge it until your vets-website changes here are merged. The content-build PR must be merged immediately after your vets-website change is merged in to avoid CI errors with content-build (and Tugboat).

⚠️ TeamSites ⚠️

Examples of a TeamSite: https://va.gov/health and https://benefits.va.gov/benefits/. This scenario is also referred to as the "injected" header and footer. You can reach out in the #sitewide-public-websites Slack channel for questions.

Did you change site-wide styles, platform utilities or other infrastructure?

Summary

  • QA fixes round 2

Related issue(s)

Testing done

-Manual / Unit / E2E/ Axe

Screenshots

Note: This field is mandatory for UI changes (non-component work should NOT have screenshots).

Before After
Mobile
Desktop

What areas of the site does it impact?

(Describe what parts of the site are impacted if code touched other areas)

Acceptance criteria

Quality Assurance & Testing

  • I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
  • No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
  • Linting warnings have been addressed
  • Documentation has been updated (link to documentation *if necessary)
  • Screenshot of the developed feature is added
  • Accessibility testing has been performed

Error Handling

  • Browser console contains no warnings or errors.
  • Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
  • Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog or Grafana (if applicable)

Authentication

  • Did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected with a test user

Requested Feedback

(OPTIONAL) What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?

@va-vfs-bot va-vfs-bot temporarily deployed to master/dependents-81671-QA-round-3/main January 17, 2025 21:16 Inactive
@va-vfs-bot va-vfs-bot temporarily deployed to master/dependents-81671-QA-round-3/main January 17, 2025 22:27 Inactive
@Midge-dev Midge-dev changed the title marriageDate Dependents | 81671: QA fixes (2nd round) Jan 23, 2025
@Midge-dev Midge-dev changed the title Dependents | 81671: QA fixes (2nd round) Dependents | 101123: QA fixes (2nd round) Jan 23, 2025
@Midge-dev Midge-dev added the dependents-benefits Label used for Pull Requests that impact Add/Remove Dependents claims (686c/674) label Jan 23, 2025
@mjknight50 mjknight50 marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2025 20:51
@mjknight50 mjknight50 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 20:51
Copy link
Contributor

@mjknight50 mjknight50 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GTG


if (end < start) {
errors.addError(
'Marriage end date must be the on or after the marriage start date',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo? Marriage end date must be the on or after the marriage start date

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will add to next QA PR
#34317


if (end < start) {
errors.addError(
'Marriage end date must be the on or after the marriage start date',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo? Marriage end date must be the on or after the marriage start date

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will add to next QA PR
#34317

@Midge-dev Midge-dev merged commit 026c47c into main Jan 29, 2025
75 checks passed
@Midge-dev Midge-dev deleted the dependents-81671-QA-round-3 branch January 29, 2025 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependents-benefits Label used for Pull Requests that impact Add/Remove Dependents claims (686c/674)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants