Issue 15: mention checksums in hybrid simulations

[teto]

In case of hybrid simulations Kernel drops packets (e.g. sends RST) if ns3 checksums are disabled.
Add a mention in documentation.

I am not sure it's the best place to put the mention ?

== EDIT
Hybrid simulations refer to simulations involving both ns and linux or BSD stacks. I would like to raise in the doc points of importance to get reasonable results.

• ns Checksums need to be enabled
• ns3 callbacks don't get called Properly relay ns3 callbacks #24
• List ns attributes that need to change (Dunno if an ns3 page exist, for instance ns3 and linux TCP RTOs differ).

[thehajime]

thanks for the PR.

I am not sure it's the best place to put the mention ?

I think it can be documented in the following file, either inside the limitation section or new one.

https://github.com/direct-code-execution/ns-3-dce/blob/master/doc/source/dce-user-tech.rst

[teto]

In fact I believe it makes sense to have an hybrid section because there are several tips/tricks onbe should be aware of such as :
#24
and also the routing interface is not unified which is a bit annoying.

[thehajime]

sorry, I don't understand what a hybrid section is. care to elaborate ?

[teto]

I am thinking of scenarios involving both ns3 and linux or BSD stacks. If
you can come up with a better name :)

2016-02-03 0:56 GMT+01:00 Hajime Tazaki [email protected]:

sorry, I don't understand what a hybrid section is. care to elaborate ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#31 (comment)
.

[thehajime]

okay.

I think for the moment we can fix one-by-one: once we come up with the nice text then we can create a new section and put this patch to the section. is it fine for you ?

[teto]

ok I'll add items to the section (dunno when though) and you deem it ready, we can merge.