ci: better release workflow

[ckohen]

Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:

Creates a proper release workflow, works in ci as well as locally.

This

• determines the release tree
• releases all packages in scope, or all packages necessary to release the specified package
• if a package is already released at a version, the registry check will allow it to skip publishing that package
•  sanity checks publish completion before moving to the next branch of the release tree
• creates the tag and publishes a release on github

Status and versioning classification:

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Ignored Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
discord-js	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Jun 23, 2024 10:36am
discord-js-guide	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Jun 23, 2024 10:36am

[kyranet]

Sorry, pressed the wrong button 😅

resolved

stale

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 311 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 49.36%. Comparing base (ba0cb66) to head (ac1b284).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...actions/src/releasePackages/generateReleaseTree.ts	0.00%	225 Missing ⚠️
...ages/actions/src/releasePackages/releasePackage.ts	0.00%	86 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10325      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   50.10%   49.36%   -0.75%     
==========================================
  Files         228      230       +2     
  Lines       20533    20844     +311     
  Branches     1236     1238       +2     
==========================================
  Hits        10289    10289              
- Misses      10199    10510     +311     
  Partials       45       45              

Flag	Coverage Δ
brokers	64.14% <ø> (ø)
builders	95.79% <ø> (ø)
collection	99.32% <ø> (ø)
formatters	99.31% <ø> (ø)
guide	0.00% <ø> (ø)
proxy	78.52% <ø> (ø)
rest	92.68% <ø> (ø)
util	68.86% <ø> (ø)
utilities	5.47% <0.00%> (-94.53%)	⬇️
voice	63.64% <ø> (ø)
website	0.00% <ø> (ø)
ws	51.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[vladfrangu]

Why do we exclude create-discord-bot from dev releases?

[ckohen]

good question, this is the existing workflow though

[Jiralite]

It was leaned away from because it's not a package like the others in a traditional sense and it has no documentation. I would be impartial to it having development releases.