Skip to content

Conversation

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

- How I did it

- How to verify it

- Human readable description for the release notes

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!


type fakeStreamResult struct {
io.ReadCloser
client.ImagePushResponse // same interface as [client.ImagePullResponse]
Copy link
Collaborator

@vvoland vvoland Oct 31, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, just noticed client.ImagePushResponse doesn't follow the "XXXResult" pattern (Response vs Result)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh! yes, you're right! I think I noticed that, but then forgot.

Looks like I picked the wrong one here (well, they're the same, but perhaps better to pick pull as we're using it for pull here.

@thaJeztah thaJeztah marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 15:49
@thaJeztah thaJeztah added this to the 29.0.0 milestone Oct 31, 2025
@thaJeztah thaJeztah added the kind/refactor PR's that refactor, or clean-up code label Oct 31, 2025
@vvoland vvoland merged commit 96bc39b into docker:master Oct 31, 2025
101 of 102 checks passed
@thaJeztah thaJeztah deleted the use_pull_for_pull branch October 31, 2025 19:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind/refactor PR's that refactor, or clean-up code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants